The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: Who's providing the best cam-from-home experience?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
Well, it's a brave new world, and we're all adjusting to new ways of working or (sadly) not working at all. Many of the girls are adjusting too and I'm curious to know who you think has stepped up to provide the best home-cam babeshow replacement service.

(Apologies if this thread already exists -- I'm sure the mods will move or delete it if it does)

From what I have seen so far:

Gemma Jane -- Gorgeous, love the outfits, alarmingly and (I think) intentionally static on FTA cam

Chrissy B -- Love the top of her head and she's refreshingly chatty again in the chatbox, but I'm not really digging the whole incognito approach. I'd rather she wore some clothes and showed her body on FTA than being naked the whole time but invisible

Tori Lee -- I wasn't a big fan of hers on the regular shows, but she really stepped up last night. Good quality cam and lighting too, which helped.

Kiki (S66) -- Credit for some solid GG work with a partner i didn't recognise, although that didn't look like safe social distancing to me

Paige Philips -- Liked what little I saw

Mikky B -- Let down, in my view, by poor cam and lighting

Katy Roux -- Looked like she was having a ball on her weekend show (credit to the caller who had her pirouetting like a circus act), but didn't look like she was enjoying herself yesterday. Still, gorgeous girl, with a good attitude when the mood strikes her.

Any more?
Certainly not Evelyn...
From the very few i've seen it would be Lola. Serenity and Kiki are also worth checking out
Daisy Dillon
Would you agree it is better to not have tip goals for cam shows?
(25-03-2020 13:59 )Charlemagne Wrote: [ -> ]Daisy Dillon
^^^ Haven't seen her yet, but now that you mention it, the Daisy on S66 was very good at the weekend too. The cam quality lets her down a bit, but there's no faulting her performance.
i would say from the shows i have watched so far a few times, Serenity, Jade, Kiki,,
Beth and Gia doing good shows but webstream lighting not that great,
Lola a good stream and lighting i havent seen much action yet but am told shes doing good stuff,
Tori great first show lastnight, best stream i have seen from any girl,
Paige P far better shows than on tv,
Maxie good webcam and good content
Just vlooking at St66 cams at present Danni K has the clearest cam so far
And Fern's cam is offering ba fantastic view!! Big Grin
It's still very much a settling in period with this isn't it. Hopefully more babes will get a handle on it as they see why guys are not buying.

As with the studio web onlys, if they're not on TV, too many babes seem to prefer the stay half unclothed and imply payment is needed to see much of anything of them at all route. But surely if these home efforts are going to be more the norm they have to incline more towards the traditional lines of engagement already established by the studio shows? (Seriously do anyone think the babeshows would have lasted 20 years if the early exponents had presented only constant views of the top of their heads! Yes loyal customers require less maintenance but why anyone would think any reasonable sized audience can be sustained via such non-existant levels of attentiveness is beyond me. It's like walking into your favourite shop and having them try to serve you by shouting at you from the back room!)

Needless to say, for me to consider paying a babe I want to see that she is prepared to present at least the basic civilities of engagement - on chat but most particularly by body language and other aspects of onscreen presentation. That is not punter wanting free ride, it is a babe setting out her stall in a respectful manner that encourages extended use of the brand. It is a babe that knows every part of her stall has value to the customer and a sign that she intends to use all the tools at her disposal in the proper manner in the service of that customer. That is keen and effective engagement.

Then there is also the issue of stunningly poor picture and/or lighting quality that we just knew would dog these things for months. Strangely some babes streams are so much better than others in this regard. I'm amazed there seems to be little conversation between babes with the aim of correct some of this. It would appear too many are unconcerned and think the same is true of the punters. They are wrong.

Anyway, it's easy for me to judge from what I've seen at the mo (only 66 babes really): Those that have stopped me flicking through the 'channels' when at home were...

Brooks - puts her down-to-earth self front and centre, full frame in nice outfits. Does tip goals as they should be done. Even does audio, answering guys in chat, in between paid interactions (a massive plus). This is a babe who knows how to use the web and has been top exponent from home so far for me. I will be back to spend.

Lola - good quality pic, good engagement and tease factor. Varied sets, poses and quality outfits. Now hopefully given free reign to do tip goals as she wishes. Can only see her going from strength to strength.

Rebecca K and Paige P, I've also seen presenting themselves full frame and in decent quality image looking like they are ready to sell to anyone rather than just a certain type of customer. Everyone else I've seen do home cams has prompted me to move off their stream for one or more of the negative reasons I've described.
Pages: 1 2
Reference URL's