The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: Should tease shows only feature girls who are willing to go topless?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
No.

Tease shows are for, guess what, TEASE.
Tease shows are absolutely fine as they are! I think Macy is fabulous on these tease shows which are better than many topless night shows....I'd rather have Macy happily teasing than a static and bored looking Kandi, wouldn't you?
(15-04-2019 12:57 )SawBoss Wrote: [ -> ]If girls had to go topless for tease shows, Heather may never have done one. Same for Rebecca Kelly. Both started out not showing boobs so to that would have been a massive shame.

This is a very good point.

If girls all along had to go topless for tease shows there might never have been any tease shows. That would have been a massive shame.
I'm with Winsaw which is its all about the time the tease shows are on. If its after 11pm then it should be a girl who is comfortable going topless, but before 11pm then its up the girls.

The early morning tease show should be about sexy outfits as I would rather watch a tease show rather than a static show;ie a woman sitting on a chair doing nothing.......
After 10pm absolutely YES!
We already have no topless shows from 5:30am to 10pm.
I do expect to see at least a few flashes of boobs during teaseshows otherwise you might aswell just call it an extended dayshow, for example Sophie Reade is attractive but she does woeful teaseshows

The best teaseshow performers are probably Rebecca, Paige and Heather as they go topless and put on raunchy performances, even though im more of a fan of Macy and Cali who don't get their boobs out, but Macy's style of tease is still very good and she is my favourite daybabe looks/bodywise so i will cut her more slack for not getting them out

I would lose interest in one of my lesser faves after a while if she carried on doing poor teaseshows, like Sophie for example
Yes and no. They can’t be full nightshows but ultimately they have to be willing to show, I.e full topless nipple on show for at least a few seconds at a time. Maybe even handbra esq like old times with flashes. Flat out no shows, no flashing isn’t tease...it’s just a dayshow.
It's a shame BS don't do teaseshows as i reckon some girls would do them even though some wouldn't get their boobs out, these days there are more daygirls i find attractive than nightgirls, so i probably can't take teaseshows for granted like i used too, i have to use webcam or sign up to onlyfans if i want to see 90% of my faves past and present naked/topless
(15-04-2019 13:42 )Rees No.1 fan Wrote: [ -> ]Tease shows are absolutely fine as they are! I think Macy is fabulous on these tease shows which are better than many topless night shows....I'd rather have Macy happily teasing than a static and bored looking Kandi, wouldn't you?

Yes I would. Macy is a good example of how a tease show can be better than a night show.
Tease shows always feel to me like it's about what the girls are comfortable with. Because they're technically not night shows i get the vibe that they're not as obligated to get the bangers out. However, if a babe feels comfortable doing so, then they have the opportunity to do so.
For example, Heather Kay and Rebecca Kelly were a lot more coy when they started doing these tease shows. But over time, they appear to have gotten more and comfortable. That's my take on it anyways.
Jim
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Reference URL's