The UK Babe Channels Forum

This is the Babestation calendar for the forthcoming year.



As some will know already, Babestation are running a competition to win a calendar signed by the featured girls. To enter, send @BabestationTV a video wishing them a happy birthday, since Babestation celebrates its 15th birthday next week, and add the hashtag #BS15 to your tweet. The competition closes at midnight on Saturday 2nd December and the most creative entry will win the signed calendar.

No Scarlett

Who's Zara Mae

No Ruby Ryder either

Zara is a camgirl, god knows why she's in the calendar

No Beth
No Scarlett Jones

As Meat Loaf would say " 1 out of 3 isn't good enough.

No Lori? No Jada? No thanks.

(28-11-2017 12:27 )Censorship :-( Wrote: [ -> ]No Lori? No Jada? No thanks.

That's how you know it must be a Fake

the fact that so many of the biggest names at bs are not in the calendar just shows how out of touch bs at the moment,
i think its an insult to girls like Beth, Alice and Lori who are the back bone of the channel with the amount of shifts they do,
and why girls who are no more than part time get in or never been on tv it dose make me lol,

(28-11-2017 16:33 )winsaw Wrote: [ -> ]the fact that so many of the biggest names at bs are not in the calendar just shows how out of touch bs at the moment,
i think its an insult to girls like Beth, Alice and Lori who are the back bone of the channel with the amount of shifts they do,
and why girls who are no more than part time get in or never been on tv it dose make me lol,

May also mean the missing ladies have calendars of their own coming out and didn't want the competition

(28-11-2017 17:23 )hairbald Wrote: [ -> ]May also mean the missing ladies have calendars of their own coming out and didn't want the competition

Don't you be coming round here with that there newfangled common sense

Damned if they do, damned if they don't.
If they filled it with the "biggest names" how many would be on here groaning it's the same old faces ?
In fairness, a lot of the Usual Suspects have already been in it previous years.
(And may have their own arrangements for own calendars as already noted).
Maybe some couldn't make themselves available for the photoshoot - more unlikely as I seem to remember some of the images used previously looked like they were from photosets previously done for the website, and not just specially for the calendar.
Maybe they're just giving others a shot.
Some of the choices do seem a bit obscure though.