yeah thats why its a load of bollocks because a lot of the talent is paid by independant prodcution companys
(20-07-2017 11:42 )SecretAgent Wrote: [ -> ]I'm astounded at some of the venom about these salaries. Where were all the complaints about footballers salaries and the mega millions film stars get paid.
The millionaires on those complaining newspapers are two faced gits!
People the world over are envious of the BBC and all some people in this country want to do is drag them down. Or is it that some people are just envious because they don't have the talent themselves?
These cnuts are paid obscene amounts AS ARE the footballers and film stars...this is way kids say they want to be famous when they are asked what they want to be growing up...not PM's or doctors
(20-07-2017 05:25 )munch1917 Wrote: [ -> ] (19-07-2017 21:52 )bigguy01 Wrote: [ -> ]...
The reason why chris evans was paid 2.2m was that he did top gear in 2016 therefore his 2917/18 salary should drop in comparison has he is no longer doing top gear,
...
As has been pointed out already, TG is made by a production company, so the wages of the presenters are not part of this total.
TG is made both the Production and BBC, Evans TG pay was partly funded by the BBC.
ITV pay lot more for 4 overrated people for several shit shows.
It seems fair now for the Government to publish the salaries of the civil severants at White Hall after forcing the BBC to publish who earns what, how about publishing the salaries of those running the nhs, police, fire, military, schools etc since they are all paid for by tax payers?
^ All these government organisations have known pay scales. They are public knowledge.
The BBC were only forced into releasing their 'talents' pay because they are negotiated contract
The BBC's top 10 salaries have again been released.. and all ten are again men.
Linekar is on 1.7 million and Evans is on 1.6 million
I know how the BBC could save £3.3millions a year
