As long as there's some balance (e.g. a session on perv, then some time moving around) i haven't got any problems with it on tv. In fact i find it a massive turn on, seeing for example, Clare so blatantly flashing her pussy to those viewing the pervcam.
And as for the dayshows, considering there's not much the girls can do other than sitting fairly motionlessly...again, I love seeing that tell-tale hand slip round their backside/up their skirt indiciating they're getting up to no good on cam (whilst on live daytime tv!)
how was this even a question...
they cant show pussy on tv unless its on the ppv channel and even then they cant show pink/fingering. due to ofcom rules on 18 vs R18 content.
(15-06-2018 07:00 )HEX!T Wrote: [ -> ]how was this even a question...
they cant show pussy on tv unless its on the ppv channel and even then they cant show pink/fingering. due to ofcom rules on 18 vs R18 content.
The question is nothing to do with showing pussy on TV, it's about pervcam being used
during a 'supposed' TV show.
"Poll: should Perv Cam be on TV or be off TV private"
OP:
(22-04-2017 00:07 )hotfuzz Wrote: [ -> ]Perv Cam should not be on TV because the babe can't put on a good performance because they have Perv Cam viewing their pussy and they are stuck in one position all the time it is pissing me off I hate Perv Cam on TV
At least, that's my reading of it.
you gotta lol at this though... guys were shouting the shows were to tame and now they have the opportunity to see a more explicit show they dont want it.
admittedly the price is steep in fact stooopid steep. but its still an available option for them that want it.
i mean what would they rather have the shit show of 2.5 years ago where the girls stayed in 1 position anyway. or they stay in 1 position and show pussy.
seriously go back in the forum 2.5 years and you will see the same guys complaining about boring shows and girls not moving.
so pervcams to me are irrelevant if the girls were already static. at least now they show and can be sexual...
in fact my only gripes are the price which puts off the vast majority and encourages guys to record. and the girls who still act like they have some modesty but will happily take your money and laugh about it while doing nothing to earn it.
(22-04-2017 00:07 )hotfuzz Wrote: [ -> ]Perv Cam should not be on TV because the babe can't put on a good performance because they have Perv Cam viewing their pussy and they are stuck in one position all the time it is pissing me off I hate Perv Cam on TV
(15-06-2018 13:55 )HEX!T Wrote: [ -> ]you gotta lol at this though... guys were shouting the shows were to tame and now they have the opportunity to see a more explicit show they dont want it.
admittedly the price is steep in fact stooopid steep. but its still an available option for them that want it.
i mean what would they rather have the shit show of 2.5 years ago where the girls stayed in 1 position anyway. or they stay in 1 position and show pussy.
seriously go back in the forum 2.5 years and you will see the same guys complaining about boring shows and girls not moving.
so pervcams to me are irrelevant if the girls were already static. at least now they show and can be sexual...
in fact my only gripes are the price which puts off the vast majority and encourages guys to record. and the girls who still act like they have some modesty but will happily take your money and laugh about it while doing nothing to earn it.
The problem is that the shows are even (MUCH) tamer as result of pervcam, and some, myself included, see no appeal whatsoever is shit quality, extortionately priced 'gyoncam'.
Pervcam, IMO, is fundamentally responsible for how utterly, fucking abysmal the 'shows' now are, in general, and Lamestation in particular.
The shows of early 2016, prior to the reintroduction of pervcam, as shit as they were, are still better that what is on now (again, IMO),
I can't be the only person who barely bothers watching the piss-take, pile of shit that now constitutes the 'TV shows', these days, can I?
Then again, maybe I am...
I think you guys are arguing at cross purposes. The OP And censorship are clearly looking at it from the viewpoint of the freeloader (cheap bastards
) while HEX!T is looking at it from the veiwpoint of the paying customer (bastards whose money props up this shit
)
Is it entirely possible that BS are making more from Perv Cam than St66 do?