07-02-2016, 05:36
Pages: 1 2
07-02-2016, 10:05
Most definitely
07-02-2016, 11:54
It's not FTA ? You have to pay to watch it.
But I agree the boy/girl stuff is not worth it as it has to be hacked to ribbons to be able to be shown on TV.
Trouble is, that would just leave even more space to keep repeating the same old Chessie Kay / Victoria Summers Sordid Life clip.
But I agree the boy/girl stuff is not worth it as it has to be hacked to ribbons to be able to be shown on TV.
Trouble is, that would just leave even more space to keep repeating the same old Chessie Kay / Victoria Summers Sordid Life clip.
07-02-2016, 17:09
(07-02-2016 11:54 )M-L-L Wrote: [ -> ]It's not FTA ? You have to pay to watch it.
But I agree the boy/girl stuff is not worth it as it has to be hacked to ribbons to be able to be shown on TV.
Trouble is, that would just leave even more space to keep repeating the same old Chessie Kay / Victoria Summers Sordid Life clip.
The channel isn't worth watching at all IMHO
07-02-2016, 20:26
But what if it was a live all night channel? bs could charge 50p for whatever girl you wanted to watch on the NOT FREE TO AIR CHANNEL
07-02-2016, 23:18
I voted yes, although on a point of order the question is phrased in a biased manner and accordingly it would not have been approved by the Electoral Commission as a fair question for a public vote.
08-02-2016, 12:36
(07-02-2016 23:18 )aaron Wrote: [ -> ]I voted yes, although on a point of order the question is phrased in a biased manner and accordingly it would not have been approved by the Electoral Commission as a fair question for a public vote.
well i could have made the options Yes/Yes....To make it a bit tougher
08-02-2016, 12:42
BSX has been the most pointless exercise and was partly reponsible for the decline of BS main shows since 2011
08-02-2016, 14:49
(08-02-2016 12:36 )davetherave57 Wrote: [ -> ](07-02-2016 23:18 )aaron Wrote: [ -> ]I voted yes, although on a point of order the question is phrased in a biased manner and accordingly it would not have been approved by the Electoral Commission as a fair question for a public vote.
well i could have made the options Yes/Yes....To make it a bit tougher
Is that Dave the rave Cameron ?
08-02-2016, 18:11
(08-02-2016 14:49 )Tractor boy Wrote: [ -> ](08-02-2016 12:36 )davetherave57 Wrote: [ -> ](07-02-2016 23:18 )aaron Wrote: [ -> ]I voted yes, although on a point of order the question is phrased in a biased manner and accordingly it would not have been approved by the Electoral Commission as a fair question for a public vote.
well i could have made the options Yes/Yes....To make it a bit tougher
Is that Dave the rave Cameron ?
TB Dont even think about associating me with that cnut
Pages: 1 2