The UK Babe Channels Forum

(03-02-2016 00:48 )winsaw Wrote: [ -> ]So you are saying that at no point you questioned scottishblokes honer and said he was not telling the truth

Correct. I did not question the story at any time.

Exact quote: "The story itself may be true or it may be untrue, who knows?"

That's what I said. Feel free to check it.

The debate I was having with Robot Devil was what the source of his story was - I suggested it was Scottishbloke, but he said it wasn't.

You still owe me an apology.

(03-02-2016 00:56 )admiral decker Wrote: [ -> ]The debate I was having with Robot Devil was what the source of his story was - I suggested it was Scottishbloke, but he said it wasn't.

Just for added clarity I DID say Scottishbloke was one of several people that had said it.

(03-02-2016 00:56 )admiral decker Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-02-2016 00:48 )winsaw Wrote: [ -> ]So you are saying that at no point you questioned scottishblokes honer and said he was not telling the truth

Correct. I did not question the story at any time.

Exact quote: "The story itself may be true or it may be untrue, who knows?"

That's what I said. Feel free to check it.

The debate I was having with Robot Devil was what the source of his story was - I suggested it was Scottishbloke, but he said it wasn't.

You still owe me an apology.

I have re read it and you question scottishblokes honour stating that anything that comes from him can't be true,
You said this end off,
So as all he said was true it's time to say sorry for questioning him,
As I am a bigger man I don't feel the need for u to apologize to me

(03-02-2016 01:02 )Robot Devil Wrote: [ -> ]Just for added clarity I DID say Scottishbloke was one of several people that had said it.

Just for even more added clarity, here it is exactly:

"To clarify, once and for all, I had already been told by three other sources that Kerrie has agreed to join BS; Scottishbloke simply reiterrated their views. So yes, I have used Scottishbloke as 'A' reference, but he was not my 'informant'."

(03-02-2016 01:03 )winsaw Wrote: [ -> ]I have re read it and you question scottishblokes honour stating that anything that comes from him can't be true,

Anything that comes from Scottishbloke is almost certainly untrue, but in this case the story didn't come from Scottishbloke, so it matters not.

End of story I think.

^ So yes, I have used Scottishbloke as 'A' reference, but he was not my 'informant'

I said he was one 'amongst others' in the message before that even. But I give up. Not worth debating. Easy to read the thread that was split.

(03-02-2016 01:03 )winsaw Wrote: [ -> ]I have re read it and you question scottishblokes honour stating that anything that comes from him can't be true,

That sounds like fair comment to me.

(03-02-2016 01:14 )admiral decker Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-02-2016 01:02 )Robot Devil Wrote: [ -> ]Just for added clarity I DID say Scottishbloke was one of several people that had said it.

Just for even more added clarity, here it is exactly:

"To clarify, once and for all, I had already been told by three other sources that Kerrie has agreed to join BS; Scottishbloke simply reiterrated their views. So yes, I have used Scottishbloke as 'A' reference, but he was not my 'informant'."

For even further clarity in the thread that now sits in the Twilight Zone in post 23 if that thread you say in your own words for the whole world to see and I quote robot devil said it was Scottish bloke

But all this is by the by as it doesn't get away from the fact that you still owe Scottishbloke an apology for saying that it was untrue what he said having reread the thread I also think you owe rodent devil and apology for the same thing Step Up be a man

Stop going on about it winsaw. You're being childish beyond belief.