28-01-2016, 19:18
(28-01-2016 16:49 )KerrAvon Wrote: [ -> ]You probably have to give some credit for her enthusiasm as there's not enough of that on the channels, & she's probably the latest buzz.
But nah, I just don't fancy her at all, no amount of oil or pussy slips will change that either lol. She ain't really got the body for a lot of outfits either. I honestly think the entire BS roster of night babes has her beat on looks/body, so pretty strange signing for me.
I generally agree Kerrie isn't really Babestation quality looks wise although i think she is hotter than 2 or 3 of the BS girls, i think she is quite young so she might look better in a couple of years if she fills out a bit, some girls looked bang average when they first started on the babeshows but now they look great, even Tori wasn't quite the goddess she is now back in 2008 because she was only about 19 or 20
I can understand why BS have signed Kerrie as she has a good attitude and she can't be described as a lazy or dull performer, i don't find Beth attractive at all but she's still a good performer and is reliable
If a girl is a munter and is lazy and boring then i'll complain about a babechannel signing her, sometimes i think we tend to wear rose tinted glasses i like Cali Garcia and Alice Goodwin but they are average/boring performers