The UK Babe Channels Forum

(14-04-2015 19:41 )terence Wrote: [ -> ]yeah, i hope you remembered to pack your polygraph!

Haul them before a Select committee at Westminister .
Actually don't bother, the politicians all seem in favour of more regulation not less.
Cwpussylover for Prime Minister .

bs probley answered the questions also as a politician would. the many like the service we offer but in life your always gonna have few people who dont like whats on offer but those happen to be us

(14-04-2015 20:59 )davetherave57 Wrote: [ -> ]One of the girls was overheard saying...... wow, look at the size of that Dic........ taphone ;-)

After which, Lori said: "Did he use his dictaphone then?"
"Nah," said producer, "he used his fingers like everyone else..."

I thank you.

I'd love to see a polygraph reading of one of these babe show bosses

(14-04-2015 21:02 )snookered147 Wrote: [ -> ]

(14-04-2015 19:41 )terence Wrote: [ -> ]yeah, i hope you remembered to pack your polygraph!

Haul them before a Select committee at Westminister .
Actually don't bother, the politicians all seem in favour of more regulation not less.
Cwpussylover for Prime Minister .

Thing is though where is the old codger?

Hey peeps,

Sorry for not pushing this up yesterday, still had to finalise some grammar, spelling mistakes and trying to get the flow right.

It may take me a while to put through as i'll be subquoting 95% of the questions asked.

I'll have this up around 10pm tonight!

Part 1!

(08-04-2015 15:57 )terence Wrote: [ -> ]can you ask them if they'll have a bonfire using the bed sets?

Laughter No.

(08-04-2015 15:59 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ]^ Lucky sod!

I'd like to know:

1. Why are some shows patently allowed to be 'hotter' than others? Even under the same compliance conditions.

That's not true, it's a matter of opinion, it's people's interpretation of what's hot and what's not. We stay within the guidelines of what we can do. You have to take into consideration the mood of the girls and what we can get away with also.

(08-04-2015 15:59 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ]2. What exactly goes into the process of deciding who's on when, for how long, on what sets, etc.? The process of selection of the schedules if you like.

There's a lot of strategy behind it and alot of observation. it's no lie, there's callstats, there's figures and statistics, we are trying to run a business at the end of the day. At the same time we try to give a good show, a good tv show, a watchable show to people that watch it. All of these things go into consideration and every single night we sit down at 6pm and go through ideas for the night and attack it, all the running orders are made, it's a lot more complicated than what I can say in a sentence. There's a lot more strategy behind it now.

(08-04-2015 15:59 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ]3. What's the reasoning behind the new idea of having some feeds available to only Freeview viewers? What data do they have on what platforms viewers call from?

So, ummmm.. right how can i say this? We are fans, we are fans of the show, fans of the industry, we are all a bunch of lads, we all want to make sure we are doing the best we can. So we come up with ideas, ideas that would cost a lot of money to put out, but we do the budget version to see if it work's, then if it’s a good’n we invest in it. So when you guys see a different feed on freeview compared to sky, it's not because we are neglecting the sky viewers, it's because we are trying to push the boat out and try something new. it's not negligence or laziness or anything like that. We are governed by many authorities and we do the best we can. It does sometimes make me laugh when i read the forums - Whenever we try something, it's not to try and piss people off, it's because we are trying to evolve this whole thing and come up with ideas. So whenever you guys see something changing, its a test to lead towards something different. The final product might not be obvious but you know, in our heads it is. All of it leads somewhere and there is a reason behind everything!

(08-04-2015 17:36 )Headgear Wrote: [ -> ]Please ask what's happening with babestation cams - I have 1000 credits in the kitty and if it's not coming back I want a refund!

So BSCams relaunched on Monday 13th, Massive apologies about that because we planned on launching the new platform on the 1st, we had loads of tech problems that we have since ironed out, however there may be some new ones that pop up in the next month or so, so please bear with us and email us if you find or experience any. It's an enormous upgrade from what we had before and we are trying to make it as user friendly and as good as any other site out there because it's a big direction for the business to be moving into. All your credit should be available on the new platform, any issues, please contact our CS team.

(08-04-2015 17:48 )Charlemagne Wrote: [ -> ]Request from me: I'd like to see more of the girls and less of the graphics.

Yup, with the OSG's, everythings mathematical, everythings strategic, we tested and tried everything over the course of 13 years. We shrank it, we increased it, created an L shape, made it transparent. Everything's very much reflective in the call volume and stats. I know alot of you watch the shows on the web so we try to keep the graphics at a minimum, just to make sure you guys are getting what you want, but at the same time for the tv, it's the strategy behind the revenue side of things.

(08-04-2015 17:48 )Charlemagne Wrote: [ -> ]Also, can we have a Babestation rep back on the forum.

Concerned Laughter Yeah... I think DJ NES should be the Babestation Rep! As long as you guys don't annihilate him, we can put a rep on the forum's but i fear for his safety! Laughter

(08-04-2015 17:56 )hairbald Wrote: [ -> ]Why does their phone system take two minutes to login?

Honestly there’s no conspiracy... We output 24/7, batteries are in constant use, they die, phones don't get put on charge etc etc. We try our best to have a rotation system with the phones but sometimes it just happens. We have the day, web and night shows and also other non adult products. We are one of the only companies that outputs this much, i just ordered a new batch of phones so they should be arriving this week. I hear all the complaints on the forums and the girls get tired of the batteries dying but again there is no conspiracy behind it. It's just a case of the phones being on all day and the battery dying.

(08-04-2015 18:00 )Mikefranz17 Wrote: [ -> ]241's Where Have They Gone Why Not Every Week, Lucy And Danniis Were Great Then Nothing Since?

Lucy and Dannii's was great... you can watch it again on babestation.tv! laughs. Yeah i mean i'm a massive 2-4-1 fan and I've been around for a good few years now and remember what we could get away with in the past. Guy's there are restrictions with what we can and can't do, i'm working on ways to give you guys more 2-4-1's, someway or another...

(08-04-2015 18:41 )davetherave57 Wrote: [ -> ]Why is it £5/£8 to watch the tamest of tame live shows & repeats of repeats throughout the night on BSX.

Also can you give Mr. 'oh yeah' a freshly made cup of polyfilla just before each live show starts.

Right... Laughter Haha, so, for those of you who know about the industry, you would know who that person is, he's an absolute legend and everytime i hear his voice i see the humour behind everything he is doing. He's a magician at what he does. Again guys please understand that there's regulations about what we can't and can't do behind encryption. I'm not sitting in my office saying "Let's NOT do this" Laughter I'm saying let's go as far as we can, please please please take it that we are trying to deliver the best content that we can, it's not a case of holding back at all.

(08-04-2015 18:42 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]Will we ever see a return of Meet The Babes, where there was 2 babes, 1 presenting and 1 who viewers would ask questions or send requests via text (like can you lick your nipple for example) if bs brought it back think viewers could also tweet the show via the bs Twitter page.

Absolutely. Definitely. 100% doing it. To be honest we talked about this particular subject this time last year, it's more of a logistics issue since we moved to MK, we are still trying to get our feet sorted with the logistics of it. I'm a massive fan of it and was both watching and producing the shows back then. You were too (to DJ NES) and it plays a big part especially now in this generation since twitters been around. I think we did it for a month around 3 years ago. 100% would love to start it up again when possible.

(08-04-2015 18:42 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]Also. Will bs ever have guest bs babes on again? A while ago bs had the likes of Sophie Dee and Mariah Milano on but hasn't been a guest bs babe for ages now. If you did it would get bs some new callers who may become regular callers to bs

It does boil down to logistics but ultimately i'm going to be honest and it's ultimately about money. For me it's a massive thing, i love the american girls coming over. Problem is what we pay vs the demand, the format itself as most american girls have never been on this type of show so they struggle with it. Plus the compliance side was a massive nightmare.

Part 2.

(08-04-2015 19:16 )babelover48 Wrote: [ -> ]Q: will BS plan a night when we can use Skype for free to call the babes?

Haha, No.

(08-04-2015 19:30 )Sm© Wrote: [ -> ]Could you ask why the Web stream quality is worse than the smaller channels (RLC, S66) ?

To be honest, it's actually better than it used to be. This is something that people forget. Everyone should realize the output we have, babestation isn't the only thing we put out as a company, different studios have different genre's and products coming out of them. When you see a competitor with a really nice feed, it's probably because it's the only thing coming out of the building. It's a tech issue, logistical issue, we are always looking to improve it but we must bear with it i guess.

(08-04-2015 19:53 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]DJ NES could you make enquires as to the future of 945 as there in no point in duplicating Blue when they could make use of this ie such as having another babe onscreen. 4 channels but only 3 of them are being used. We need answers I think.

Theres an economical strategy behind that channel that I can’t go into detail about.

(08-04-2015 20:03 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ]4. What's your take on why none of the babe channels have ever challenged Ofcom in court?

No one will, we are governed by them, we respect them, their opinions and we all try and stay happy together.

(08-04-2015 20:03 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ]5. Where do you see the babe shows in five years time?

Evolved, modernized. More intimate, more personal. I don't want to give too much away Laughter

(08-04-2015 20:03 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ]6. Have you ever considered some sort of paid live event from fans to meet, have a few words with, get a pic with, or autograph signed by, the babes?

We have done it before, ummm, yeah, yeah, i have thought about it, i just haven't come around to it yet, it comes down to logistics, staffing, who goes, security etc. Keep in mind that when a bunch of girls go, they are out of the schedule so there's the budget side and i haven't really explored that side for the last couple of years.

(08-04-2015 20:20 )snookered147 Wrote: [ -> ]What factors are used to decide 2-4-1 regularity and the nature of the pairings?

If the girl's like each other… In that way Laughs

(08-04-2015 20:20 )snookered147 Wrote: [ -> ]Do the babes want to do more of them?

Yes.

(08-04-2015 20:20 )snookered147 Wrote: [ -> ]Why are water based sets not deployed more often?

Do you know what, i'm a massive fan of water based sets. Genuinely am and i'm currently trying to get one of the showers re-tiled so it looks good on tv. Honestly, think of it like this. Girl, Fake Tan, doesn't want to get wet. Laughs So if you wanna be the guy that comes to try and persuade one of these girls to get in the shower at 10pm then be my guest!

(08-04-2015 20:20 )snookered147 Wrote: [ -> ]What happened to the sauna and paddling pool sets?

The paddling pool set is still around, it was on BSX recently. The sauna is flatpacked in storage, is was on unleashed for a while, might make a return soon if you guys fancy it back.

(08-04-2015 20:20 )snookered147 Wrote: [ -> ]Is there a way that the size of the OSGs can be made less obstructive along with the size of the number strip?

Is there a way? Yes. Is it viable in a business sense? Probably not. Will i take a look at it? Absolutely.

(08-04-2015 20:20 )snookered147 Wrote: [ -> ]Have BS ever thought about the possibility of the removal of all OSG and number strip enablement via the pressing of a button on the remote? Preferably this would be cross channel.

We explored this a few years ago, it's technically beyond our capability and it cost's an arm and a leg. I've personally explored for the likes of BSX and FTA. So atm it's a no but we have explored it.

(08-04-2015 20:20 )snookered147 Wrote: [ -> ]Why don't more props get introduced into the set use to really make the most of the theme in play. For example: Babe goes into a gym set.
Why not have a series of exercise tools for the babes to have a go on. If they were careful with their movement and position techniques they could do it all naked too .

Yeah! Great idea, we have a gym set flatpacked we can bring back out. Yeah let's bring the Gym set back. I'll bring it back out next friday (24th).

(08-04-2015 20:20 )snookered147 Wrote: [ -> ]Why is there such a predominance with sets that encourage babes to lie down and sit down on things? It encourages lack of movement imo.

If you think back to erghhhh about a year and a half ago? Where all of our sets were bed sets, we've actually evolved and come to a point now where we have a lot of standing sets, i personally am a fan of standing sets as i think the girl's perform better. Here's some insight, we know exactly what fav positions the girls have, what hand they hold the phone in, which position they move their head towards the camera, this is what production is about. There are some girls who perform much better when they are laid down or much better standing up.

(08-04-2015 20:20 )snookered147 Wrote: [ -> ]Why bother with quickfire rounds? If people ring up for quick satisfaction the presence of a quickfire round won't change their approach anyway. For those like me that like to make the conversation last a decent length of time are simply not going to ring for a 2/3 minute chat.

Different tastes, different people. There is a lot of people who call for a quick fire round and a lot of people who call for normal length chats. We try to tailor for everyone. It's a case of studying the calls and what you want and trying to give it to you as best we can.

(08-04-2015 20:20 )snookered147 Wrote: [ -> ]Would the channel ever consider a competition for forum members where the prize was to be a BS producer for a night? I would definitely be interested! Not just to meet the babes but provide some input on how I think the stints can be improved. I am not shy in voicing my opinions and often wonder why stints turn out the way they do .

There's a misconception of production wherein people think it's a jolly. My guys are very very hard working guys and in all honesty i practically beat them with a stick Laughs They're drilled, it's very very hard work, the only reason i don't open it up for the people on the forums to work here is because of the mentality that you can walk in and have a jolly and fun with the girls. It's very very hard work.

Part 3!

(08-04-2015 20:44 )Goodfella3041 Wrote: [ -> ]If they could bring ONE girl back from retirement, who would it be?

Hmmmm. That's a good one... Give me a Min... ponders for 30 seconds Daryl Morgan.

(08-04-2015 21:58 )davetherave57 Wrote: [ -> ]Why are some girls on longer than others... I don't want a bullcrap response about call revenue...we have all seen certain girls begging and pleading for a call and waving the phone like a screaming banshee for what seems like ages.

Sorry to say it Davetherave but it all boils down to call revenue.

(08-04-2015 21:58 )davetherave57 Wrote: [ -> ]And finally can you beg and plead to get the real Paige T back for the odd special show.

Paige is very happy, she's doing her thing. Were good friends and Im genuinely very very happy for her and where she is in her life

(08-04-2015 22:01 )bigfatpiggyporker Wrote: [ -> ]Are they considering bringing on any new girls or are they content with the current roster (both day and night shows) ?

Babestation is a bit of a magnet for glamour and for girls who want to get in the glamour industry. You know, we launch different products, explore different avenues that sort of thing. I love the girls we have, i'm friends with them all and close with them, ummm, but you know if anyone wants to join the babestation family they are more than welcome.

(08-04-2015 22:19 )Whynot Wrote: [ -> ]3 Pages and nobody asks.... please show us the call stats

Nope! Secrets

(08-04-2015 22:59 )jimmyt73 Wrote: [ -> ]will we ever see the climax line return as there had been some decent ones until recently.

Yes. Soon. Bare with!

(08-04-2015 23:05 )HEX!T Wrote: [ -> ]my question would be why not have more studio cams that broadcast to the web only. and why not make them part of the monthly membership rather than pay per minute like they did with the perv cam.

Hmm, yeah that's a good idea. We can do that, haven't really thought of that before, yeah we can explore that. See how it works out logistically.

(08-04-2015 23:14 )davetherave57 Wrote: [ -> ]And the biggest BSX wonder is.... how they have the gall to show pussy rubbing in most of the prerecorded films but not on the actual live show?

Shooting live tv is very tricky. There's a fine line we have to stick to, With the pre-recorded stuff there's so much editing and compliance and quality control over it all. That's why.

(09-04-2015 09:11 )amy1 Wrote: [ -> ]Why was ruby summers bumped from the night shows? yet one's like cali garcia and ashley emma are still there. Surely you want the best and most entertaining?

I love Ruby. Cali's a lovely girl, ashley's a lovely girl, rubys a lovely girl, genuinely like ruby as a person shes a really good performer. We try to explore different options with her, daytime, unleashed etc

(09-04-2015 09:11 )amy1 Wrote: [ -> ]Is lori as annoying in real life as she appears to be on screen?

Laughs Lori is not annoying. She's a lovely girl!

(09-04-2015 09:11 )amy1 Wrote: [ -> ]Did Maddison rose really have sex with the camera man?

Laughs Oh god... NO!!



(09-04-2015 09:11 )amy1 Wrote: [ -> ]Can i have preeti's number?

Yes! 0906....

(09-04-2015 09:32 )Bandwagon Wrote: [ -> ]What happened to Starlets and might we see something similar to replace it?

Starlets was a real nice venture and really enjoyed it whilst it lasted. We will see something in the future. Ive got some ideas in the pipeline which ill try to get to soon.

(09-04-2015 16:51 )Headgear Wrote: [ -> ]Why does BS constantly advertise girls are live on BS cams when they are physically not logged in nor are going to be that evening

We never advertise girls who aren't online. If you've gone to the website and their not on, she may be on a break, the system is linked, when they log on the graphic pops up.

(09-04-2015 16:51 )Headgear Wrote: [ -> ]Is BS going to do anything about girls hiding behind the group/VIP option when they are just sat doing bugger all?

The new camsite addresses alot of these issues. You are always welcome to send us feedback about your experiences.

(09-04-2015 19:24 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]Back in 2006 we had a show on Playboy TV (Encrypted Channel) called Nightcalls live which was basically a live show in front of a live audience with the hottest porn stars which was hosted by Jesse Jane and Kirsten Price in which they also used to get fully naked throughout the show.

It was a brilliant format which allowed the fans to get up and close with all their favourite porn stars. What about BS doing similar. This ofcourse would only be able to be broadcast on an encrypted channel which then brings me onto my next question.

Aswell as BSX being available on freeview aswell as SKY I'd like to see a second encrypted channel being launched for such shows to take place.

2006 the industry was thriving, a lot of money being thrown about, logistically right now its pretty much impossible, it will cost an arm and a leg to do. I've already thought about it and ran the numbers together but really it would be tough. If i can i will!

(10-04-2015 19:34 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: [ -> ]About the daytime shows; it was a few weeks ago that Charlie C and Flick were getting excited about the news that they would be allowed to wear bikinis during the days. However, I have not seen any girl wearing one yet, so was this a false alarm or are they just waiting for the weather to get a bit warmer?

It was a false alarm. Misinformation unfortunately.

(10-04-2015 19:52 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ]What do you see as the main difficulties in producing a babe show at the moment?

Trying to put out what you think is amazing but cant because of regs. I would love you to all be a fly on the wall at our brainstorm sessions. “Can we do this… NOPE!” “how about… NOPE!” Laughs

(10-04-2015 19:52 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ]How do you think BS's output compares against that of its competitors?

I think we compete. Yeah. Fine.

(10-04-2015 19:52 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ]Do you have recordings of all BS' transmissions since it began? Has any thought be given to monetising this archive by making it available through your website?

We don't have many recordings of the FTA shows. but there are bits and bobs. we do have a very large archive of pre-recorded content stretching back 13 years which is being re-encoded and checked/edited as we speak.

(10-04-2015 19:52 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ]10. BS daytime could be seen as the 'poor cousin' to its night shows. How do you see your day shows on the list of BS priorities?

BS Daytime has been a pretty big part of this year. We invested a lot of money into it, expanded it, introduced some new products into it, it actually got a lot more love than the night shows did. It's good grounds for pushing the product forward during the daytime hours. It plays a major role in what we do here.

Final part and a word from the boss.

(11-04-2015 01:31 )M-L-L Wrote: [ -> ] Can you ask them why they're so desperate to find out what we know about acid house music ?

Laughs We have a in-house DJ who makes these tracks and albums for us and he's very good! You know different tastes for different people! Laughs

(11-04-2015 08:35 )AprilFools Wrote: [ -> ]My question is regarding sets. Why do so many of them look so cheap and tacky? Some admittedly look "ok" the leather sofa one for example but the office set is starting to look very tired and worn around the edges, and the platform ones need a revamp too.

Little bit of insight into what goes on, that office set gets painted twice a week. We use a lot of oil on our shows and our performances are a lot more active than our competitors so our sets take quite a beating every single night. We did have a professional build these for us and they are built to last. 24 hours a day they are built to be durable.

(11-04-2015 08:35 )AprilFools Wrote: [ -> ]Also the graffiti set for unleashed is just plain offensive to the eyes. Not what's written on the walls(it is a sex line show after all), just the amateurish way it was implemented. Have moaned before about it. Surely with the money they make they could get a "professional" to do a decent stab at it. I don't watch the other babe channels but their sets seem head and shoulders above anything BS have.

I like the graffiti set! Laughs i like that the guys made it, again it comes down to the performance.

(11-04-2015 08:35 )AprilFools Wrote: [ -> ]Also Lighting!!!!! Sort it out!!! Unleashed (particularly when Beth is on) you need night vision goggles to see the girls.

Literally as we speak new lighting is being put in across the shows.

(13-04-2015 18:07 )Censorship :-( Wrote: [ -> ]Why no 'Hand Panty'? - I thought that 'Ofcon' said a long time ago that even they weren't bothered by it?

Ofcom don't like it at all.

And finally a few words from the man himself.

BabeBoss Wrote:Thanks for coming to see me DJ NES and I hope I've answered the questions to everyone’s liking. The forums are an interesting read for me as its genuine and live feedback for things we try to do. I hope everyone can appreciate what goes into making these shows happen and if you got ideas i'm always ready to listen.

Like I said were all a bunch of guys that really enjoy what we do and if we can get our ideas on screen we never hold back. You know, I would love to have everyone of the forum in our “war room” so we can all reinvent the wheel together.

Personally can I shout out Circles_o_o_o, ScottishBloke, TractorBoy, SecretAgent, DavetheRave even though you're going through a “hate on bs” phase haha and Rammy… Deep down you know you love us Hahah!