Due to this subject seemingly never going away I think the best way is to gauge opinion is with a simple Yes/No question which will say the following:
Do you as a forum member care about Call Stats.
Yes
No
NO.
NO.
NO.
NO.
NO.
... and NO.
Have I been clear enough?
I would rather watch Ella jolie for 6 hours than read one more post mentioning call stats
Might as well be the first "Yes" vote!
I care about call stats when they are relevant to the discussion and I don't care when they aren't. It's not really a yes or no question. At a minimum, it needs a "Sometimes" option.
When someone says that they hate the extended day shows on S66, call stats are -- in my opinion -- completely irrelevant to that discussion.
When you ask why on earth S66 are persisting with these awful extended dayshows, what in god's name are they thinking ... I'm sorry, but there is no answer to that which does not involve call stats.
To my mind, the people who complain most violently about these call stat references are the ones who most frequently invite those references by constantly trying to be armchair producers.
(26-03-2015 00:02 )Whynot Wrote: [ -> ]I would rather watch Ella jolie for 6 hours than read one more post mentioning call stats
I would rather study call stats for 6 hours than watch 2 minutes of Ella Jolie.
SB, obviously this thread is really about you having a go at another at another prolific and knowledgeable forum contributor. You are aware that baiting the Master is not good for you?
(26-03-2015 00:39 )steviebaby Wrote: [ -> ] (26-03-2015 00:02 )Whynot Wrote: [ -> ]I would rather watch Ella jolie for 6 hours than read one more post mentioning call stats
I would rather study call stats for 6 hours than watch 2 minutes of Ella Jolie.
Poor Ella!
What has she done to you?
No it's not, SB It's you Master baiting
(26-03-2015 00:56 )KRISB Wrote: [ -> ]No it's not, SB It's you Master baiting