(08-06-2015 20:34 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]^ What I actually said is in your original quote of mine... Key word was "Letting", which means allowing.
So, by your own twisted logic, if a woman 'lets' herself be raped then it's not a crime?
You guys have completely misunderstood and misrepresented what mrmann said. To make matters worse you have then gone all Billy Big Balls and turned this into a massive argument.
Are you hoping Harry will read this and be impressed? Aw, bless...
You have to admit it sounds pretty ludicrous the idea of a producer going up to a girl and saying "if I give you a bonus can I drop my trousers and start bashing one out in front of you and everyone else in the building" , also a question I've wanted an answer to for ages is why does mrmann have an obsession with the notion that behind the scenes at babe channels are just 24/7 orgies . I'm not having a go I just wondered why he could see things that others can't I.e babe is being fingered,banged or giving handjob/blowjob. Maybe I just have a Shite imagination
^exactly, even if harry amelia 'allowed' this, what about everyone else in the vicinity. you'd have to get everyone's consent to bash one out in front of them! beyond ludicrous!
(09-06-2015 10:16 )terence Wrote: [ -> ]^exactly, even if harry amelia 'allowed' this, what about everyone else in the vicinity. you'd have to get everyone's consent to bash one out in front of them! beyond ludicrous!
Everyone else in the vicinity? Half of the time when we see the backgrounds it's empty. The sets have three walls to them as well. I stand by what I said. I don't think it's out of the realm for a babe channel woman who accepts money elsewhere to watch men wank to allow a producer to wank in front of her, especially if she's getting something out of it.
Your assumption that a producer would have to go around and get consent from everyone is ludicrous, and I think you know this as well. You think everyone can see all that is going on? If it was one giant room with more than one woman there, I could see the producer asking if the other person minded, but with one person, who else will be there but maybe another crew member at most? I think most of this stuff takes place behind the scenes, but as we know, things go on in front and around the camera too.
As for General Drogo, well I guess you don't watch much of the channels then...
Nice to know that Phonebook can think in the grey area, and not just black or white like some of the others here.
(09-06-2015 22:07 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]Your assumption that a producer would have to go around and get consent from everyone is ludicrous, and I think you know this as well.
if he wanted to masturbate in front of them he would need their consent, yes.
you're a loon!
^Dude, are you and munch connected at the hip? You as well only read my first sentence. Of course he'd have to get consent from anyone. I'm talking about a set where there's the cameraman, and woman, not everyone else.
sorry dude, i'm not heading down the rabbit hole with you. i'm out.
^Except you made the effort of contributing to the argument in the first place. All I ask if for people to read what I wrote, not just one sentence where I could have been more specific.
Silent Majority's comment is beyond stupid and kind of like what munch posts. He seems like another one who can't read and who likes to put sick words into someone's mouth.
Gents I'm going into hospital tomorrow for an operation which I'm a wee bit anxious about. I just wanted to say thanks for taking my mind of it as I've never laughed so hard in all my life trying to make sense of all these posts
The words WTF spring to mind here and no I'm not thanking anybody's posts on this Thread, Scottishbloke has the right to remain neutral
