She is looking very very nice indeed...it's a case of making the best of her while we still can.
(05-11-2009 13:44 )samanthabuxton Wrote: [ -> ]not with dale winton !??!
new website http://www.samanthabuxton.net - tell me what you think of the graphics , im finding it inpersonal and not very friendly/inviting :-S
Hi Sam:
Apart from the zero SEO (Search Engine Optimsation) value of this type of flash-style design, I doubt you'll attract many new sign-ups with this site.
Those who know you won't mind, but for those who haven't seen you before, there's simply not enough content to encourage a purchase decision.
If I hadn't seen the site before, I'd also assume that images and videos are 'boxed' - i.e. can't be downloaded and saved. Obviously, I don't know if this is the case, but it pays to publish this kind of information to encourage sign-ups. The limited screen realestate on the site also prompts questions.
Never come across Starlett TV before, but didn't think much of their site. Very limited tour, with little content on display, no model directory... etc. I'd assume they only have a handful of models on the site - another reason not to join.
Sorry I can't be more positive - you still look great though.
Best wishes on your new venture. MeT
(05-11-2009 13:44 )samanthabuxton Wrote: [ -> ]not with dale winton !??!
new website http://www.samanthabuxton.net - tell me what you think of the graphics , im finding it inpersonal and not very friendly/inviting :-S
Im not keen on the colour and the roting images are a little bit anoying
but at the end of the day your pics are good and your blue eyes really stand out
i know i totally agree !! i thought it was me being fussy or silly ( as told ) but i think il go it alone as planned !!! iv got my own being sorted as we speak!
