Good job that the carvery waitress didn't catch Lacey's BSX performances.
Her comments would have been more than "At least I don't get my t*ts out on TV".
(14-01-2015 15:37 )m100 Wrote: [ -> ]the answer to that is for everyone on here to visit the mirror's page and vote yes - give them an answer they don't want
Your argument does not seem logical.
If you're right, that the Mirror wish the poll to have a certain outcome, then surely everyone on here going to visit the page and voting yes would be utterly pointless, because they could still fiddle the vote regardless and make the outcome of the poll to be any figures they want.
(14-01-2015 14:07 )Robot Devil Wrote: [ -> ]Just because she's in retail doesn't mean she has to bite her tongue.
It does actually, otherwise the business gets adverse publicity.
It's always better for tongues to be bitten, regardless of how unreasonably the customer is behaving.
(14-01-2015 17:28 )Tractor boy Wrote: [ -> ]It's hypocrisy from mirror group newspapers, the sunday people discovered Sam Fox and put topless pics of her in the paper when she was just 16
It's only hypocrisy if they are fixing the poll, surely?
Do you have any evidence that it's not a fair vote and that the outcome of the vote is being rigged?
(14-01-2015 19:18 )admiral decker Wrote: [ -> ] (14-01-2015 17:28 )Tractor boy Wrote: [ -> ]It's hypocrisy from mirror group newspapers, the sunday people discovered Sam Fox and put topless pics of her in the paper when she was just 16
It's only hypocrisy if they are fixing the poll, surely?
Do you have any evidence that it's not a fair vote and that the outcome of the vote is being rigged?
The way the poll question was worded suggests they are being anti glamour models, they wouldn't ask is electrical engineering a respectable profession would they ?
(14-01-2015 19:02 )Charlemagne Wrote: [ -> ]Good job that the carvery waitress didn't catch Lacey's BSX performances.
Her comments would have been more than "At least I don't get my t*ts out on TV".
"at least I turn up for work when expected to"
"At least I turn up for work without being off my head"
And so on
(14-01-2015 20:15 )Tractor boy Wrote: [ -> ]The way the poll question was worded suggests they are being anti glamour models, they wouldn't ask is electrical engineering a respectable profession would they ?
That's a very thin argument.
Lacey complained about being derided for getting her tits out on TV, so the newspaper asked if glamour modelling's a respectable profession.
Nobody's been derided for being an electrical engineer, so your analogy isn't valid.
It's easy to reverse your argument and claim that the Mirror is supporting Lacey by running the poll. After all, it suggests despite the waitress comment that glamour modelling may be a respectable occupation.
(14-01-2015 13:11 )lacey_fan Wrote: [ -> ]As for the article, its all just pure nonsense seems like Lacey is milking it for 2min of fame.
Perhaps going to the press was just a way of getting some revenge. After all she was so upset that she threatened to kill the waitress, which is why the police was called. Since Lacey was that wound up I imagine the police being called would have wound her up even more, quite likely to the point of revenge seeking.
More excellent 'tits-out-on-tv' action from Lacey last night, it was very striking how much more animated she was than the other girls on with her.
Giving it the beans for the 40% of Mirror readers who appreciate her.
