The UK Babe Channels Forum

^ Exactly, already being more censored than Fernanda! So lame. She's definitely being restricted. Really hope she goes to Babestation.

^^
must have a producer tonight who clearly doesn't like babes going naked a lot or is scared of ofcom

No consistency whatsoever.
Farcical .

for once I do agree, got to have consistency with how the babeshow rules are interpreted. Fernanda's producer last night clearly has interpreted the rules differently compared to Kerrie-Lee's producer tonight

even so think so far it's been a very good show from Kerrie-Lee tonight with oil & nudity

^ I agree with that. Even though the stupid thing is it MIGHT even be the same guy.
Seems to me we can't say on even that these days. Inconsistency can come from several reasons.

(18-01-2016 01:30 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]Fernanda's producer last night clearly has interpreted the rules differently compared to Kerrie-Lee's producer tonight

Not necessarily. It might be the same guy who just trusts Fernanda more than he trusts Kerrie-Lee.

Regardless of what producer Kerrie-Lee has last night, it was still a brilliant babe of the night performance from her including nakedness & oil. Also was her usual fun bubbly self

Hope she's back on soon

(18-01-2016 02:38 )southlondonphil Wrote: [ -> ]

(18-01-2016 01:30 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]Fernanda's producer last night clearly has interpreted the rules differently compared to Kerrie-Lee's producer tonight

Not necessarily. It might be the same guy who just trusts Fernanda more than he trusts Kerrie-Lee.

...for one... or:

2. Plain favouritism.
3. He could have been told or realised he was too lenient with Fernanda.
4. He could have been more inclined to leave off the button when he saw how well Fernanda was doing on the phones as opposed to, perhaps, KL's more normal stats.

As I say, all open to debate, and as Rammy says pretty irrelevant really, it just proves what we have known all along: We will never know when that button will be pressed even with the same guy in charge as the rules are so open to interpretation on any given night.

I have just realised (very stupidly ) that it is only 66 of the babe channels that does their censorship in this way. I'm not sure what that says about 66 as opposed to the others. Is it that they are perhaps more cautious (micro-managing) and perhaps, as phil implies, less trusting of the talent's judgement; or is it that, by taking the responsibility on themselves the producers feel they can let their babes potentially fly closer to the mark?

Regardless, it is definitely a different take on the conundrum to the other channels and probably leads to more varied content levels than elsewhere (maybe frustratingly so for the viewer/caller?). I doubt if more consistency could ever be achieved if they stick to this logo method.

For all it's faults, personally, I'd rather have it than not due to the above.

Shoot all the fucking producers Then we would get nudie shows Would love to see Kerrie's oily chuff

I also got the impression that she was being rationed with her use of oil??????
Let the babe do her thing and we'll get a visual treat

Like a wise man once said: "PECKINGORDERITUS"