Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Doesn't the launch of this channel inevitably mean less variety on the premier Babestation channels?
not really thy usally have more than enough babes to cover breaks and they usally end up doing cams while they are off air
(06-08-2014 11:15 )Tractor boy Wrote: [ -> ]Bs have stigmatized the channel before it has started because if you read between the lines what they are saying is it's the channel for the girls not successful enough to get on the main channels. I think this is unfair on girls like Maddie and Mica.
But Maddie's been bumped off the main channels anyway and relegated to daytime shows. So she's already been categorised as a level 2 performer. At least this way she's gets a promotion back to doing night shows.
^^^
Agree the sound on 945 is lousy at the moment. Hopefully be fixed for when starlets starts tonight
I really do not understand BS and their show formats, websites, TV stations. The whole thing is more confusing than the current BMW range, and that tis saying something. What does this 'new' channel offer that the others don't? "A mix of new and not so new talent" sounds just like every other channel they have...
I used to like BS Apprentice - it introduced some short-lived but super-sexy girls like Olivia Bond. Then there was the fleeting Babestation Ebony which would have been superb but never got out of the hangar. It might make sense to resurrect Apprentice or an Academy or Audition Channel, or have a channel devoted to black, indian chinese and ethnic girls.
(06-08-2014 11:57 )Lotuseater Wrote: [ -> ]What does this 'new' channel offer that the others don't?
Different girls to the premier channels including newcomers.
Why is it on sky only??? considering every home in the uk has freeview,and a lot less who have sky.......makes common sense to put it on FTA & Pronto......
(06-08-2014 12:50 )davetherave57 Wrote: [ -> ]makes common sense to put it on FTA & Pronto......
It doesn't make common sense at all. Freeview channels are expensive to operate compared to Sky channels. To make a freeview channel pay you need the big hitters who really bring in the calls and we already know that Babestation's big hitters won't be appearing on this channel.
(06-08-2014 13:02 )admiral decker Wrote: [ -> ] (06-08-2014 12:50 )davetherave57 Wrote: [ -> ]makes common sense to put it on FTA & Pronto......
It doesn't make common sense at all. Freeview channels are expensive to operate compared to Sky channels. To make a freeview channel pay you need the big hitters who really bring in the calls and we already know that Babestation's big hitters won't be appearing on this channel.
I would settle for big titters
Im sick of freeviewers moaning BS started well before freeview and was going very well till they went for freeview audience and thats when the rot set in
both S66 and RLC are not on freeview yet they are the ones making profits and BS is still making losses
just because freeview is avaiable doesnt mean that the audience is there for them.
im guessing target audiences are men between 18 - 40 and most single men will have a sky subscription
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13