The roaming cam made it more convincing, supposedly putting us in the picture but add a Mr P and it loses any credibility at all because we just become surplus to requirements. I've said this many, many times it is all PLANNED in advance, where he can touch her, how and how far he can go. I can't vouch for Sophie but Alice doesn't deliver what people are expecting.
Of course it is, none of the babes who've done these shows are remotely anywhere near "pornstars" and even if they were there would still be boundaries.
I thought the MrP angle was great when it began and over the past 6 months it has of course moved on at a pace. Good for Alice (and more recently) to Sophie but Alice in particular. However is this a tease channel or something different? BSX or BSWeb? BSTV is admittedly awful these days. Last night’s Alice/MrP show was pretty average yet 6 months ago we’d have been celebrating. The show a week ago had us all thinking what went on when they blurred the screen? Cynically I suspect BS/Alice has and does make a significant amount of money from these shows and that’s supply and demand. But equally there is now an angel on one shoulder (tradition/tease) and a devil on the other (push the boundaries some more). Wherever you sit on this the production values need to keep up and they haven’t lately; MrP might have turned in for a shift last night despite being ‘ill’ but it might have been better if he hadn’t tried? But if the idea was to somehow recalibrate to six months back, that is probably not an option. So, BS MrPs whoever you are and the lovely BS girls, time for imagination and a strategy. Sorry - a first post and no wish to annoy, but surely I can’t be alone?
Absolutely agree Bluenose
Pandora's box has been opened. There is no going back. The motivation is of course money, you only have to listen to pervcam where the obsession is how many PC hours they have done (a key KPI apparently). No criticism, in fact if it motivates them to do "more, more, more" to quote Alice then all the better.
Lets face it, no-one could have imagined 12 months ago that Alice would be riding an admittedly flaccid Mr P sans pants. Or that said Mr P would be rubbing her pussy on pervcam.
People complain that it is fake. Watch the shows a year ago. Were they real? Were they seriously better? I remember when Alice was a daytime only girl and all we got was the occasional nip slip.
(22-12-2019 00:12 )Bluenose1959 Wrote: [ -> ]I thought the MrP angle was great when it began and over the past 6 months it has of course moved on at a pace. Good for Alice (and more recently) to Sophie but Alice in particular. However is this a tease channel or something different? BSX or BSWeb? BSTV is admittedly awful these days. Last night’s Alice/MrP show was pretty average yet 6 months ago we’d have been celebrating. The show a week ago had us all thinking what went on when they blurred the screen? Cynically I suspect BS/Alice has and does make a significant amount of money from these shows and that’s supply and demand. But equally there is now an angel on one shoulder (tradition/tease) and a devil on the other (push the boundaries some more). Wherever you sit on this the production values need to keep up and they haven’t lately; MrP might have turned in for a shift last night despite being ‘ill’ but it might have been better if he hadn’t tried? But if the idea was to somehow recalibrate to six months back, that is probably not an option. So, BS MrPs whoever you are and the lovely BS girls, time for imagination and a strategy. Sorry - a first post and no wish to annoy, but surely I can’t be alone?
I agree with you. The reheated Alice/Mr. P shows over the past few weeks have certainly raised a dilemma for BS and Alice. Fans (inc. myself) now completely disdain the routine cheesy 'sitting on the desk' TV routine, and eagerly look forward to the web-only offerings.
The problem now is how far the performers are prepared to go to satisfy the demands of a potentially huge audience. OK, I accept that pervcam is the vehicle to pay for this - but when it is so obvious that fakery is being employed (just witness the howls of derision from paying pervcam customers in the live feedback threads) - revenue must eventually dwindle as punters realise they are getting nothing extra for their money.
So what next? - do they employ real porn performers? - or remain at the current standard - possibly using more daring girls like Sophie H or the gloriously uninhibited Atlanta to push the boundaries (and cameramen/ MrP's who are better equipped to cope with the stresses of public performance)??
It would certainly be an interesting experiment for BS to really go for it on the webshow 1 or 2 nights per week to see if the revenue justified the investment. It would certainly dent the competition's audience on those nights.
What do folks think?
Atlanta, Caty and Nicole have done lapdances for their Mr.P's(some naked) which were a lot better because at least you got to see more of the girls not the organ grinders and they weren't allowed to be touched(as is with normal lapdances) but Atlanta's and Caty's were particularly good. I'd rather watch that than what Alice is doing.
(22-12-2019 01:07 )TheProf Wrote: [ -> ]I agree with you. The reheated Alice/Mr. P shows over the past few weeks have certainly raised a dilemma for BS and Alice. Fans (inc. myself) now completely disdain the routine cheesy 'sitting on the desk' TV routine, and eagerly look forward to the web-only offerings.
The problem now is how far the performers are prepared to go to satisfy the demands of a potentially huge audience. OK, I accept that pervcam is the vehicle to pay for this - but when it is so obvious that fakery is being employed (just witness the howls of derision from paying pervcam customers in the live feedback threads) - revenue must eventually dwindle as punters realise they are getting nothing extra for their money.
So what next? - do they employ real porn performers? - or remain at the current standard - possibly using more daring girls like Sophie H or the gloriously uninhibited Atlanta to push the boundaries (and cameramen/ MrP's who are better equipped to cope with the stresses of public performance)??
It would certainly be an interesting experiment for BS to really go for it on the webshow 1 or 2 nights per week to see if the revenue justified the investment. It would certainly dent the competition's audience on those nights.
What do folks think?
I think that’s precisely the dilemma but I agree too with @ai1234 Pandora’s Box has been opened. So there’s no “going back”. The question is what is going “forward”??
(21-12-2019 21:18 )GMach1 Wrote: [ -> ]I bet if you look at her OnlyFans you won't find a single acutal b/g scene because she is not a porn star and of course married(okay Beth did some stuff but that was with her then boyfriend) and I doubt you will see her do it UNLESS she has a dramatic change of direction.
him shoving his fingers in and out her pussy and arsehole dont count as b/g then,cause they are doing that on perv cam on b/s
(22-12-2019 01:22 )Bluenose1959 Wrote: [ -> ] (22-12-2019 01:07 )TheProf Wrote: [ -> ]
I think that’s precisely the dilemma but I agree too with @ai1234 Pandora’s Box has been opened. So there’s no “going back”. The question is what is going “forward”??
As long as they don't invest in a bath tub and a 1000 cans of baked beans.
(22-12-2019 16:15 )shankey! Wrote: [ -> ] (21-12-2019 21:18 )GMach1 Wrote: [ -> ]I bet if you look at her OnlyFans you won't find a single acutal b/g scene because she is not a porn star and of course married(okay Beth did some stuff but that was with her then boyfriend) and I doubt you will see her do it UNLESS she has a dramatic change of direction.
him shoving his fingers in and out her pussy and arsehole dont count as b/g then,cause they are doing that on perv cam on b/s
Semantics aside if you asked most people (outside of the forum!) to describe what is happening on pervcam they would call it porn.