(29-06-2015 06:39 )Rob169 Wrote: [ -> ]You didn't realy miss anything that you haven't seen before, and anything you couldn't see just look at her pics :/
What else would you like? A moon on a stick maybe? A herd of performing Unicorns?
Best I've seen from Cara last night. She looked fantastic.
(29-06-2015 16:32 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ]snip
So did you call her then ?
(29-06-2015 19:28 )Tumble_Drier Wrote: [ -> ] (29-06-2015 06:39 )Rob169 Wrote: [ -> ]You didn't realy miss anything that you haven't seen before, and anything you couldn't see just look at her pics :/
What else would you like? A moon on a stick maybe? A herd of performing Unicorns?
Well atleast that would be something new :/
(29-06-2015 20:16 )Rob169 Wrote: [ -> ]So did you call her then ?
Nope, because even if I spent my money on calls, which I don't (as I've said on here several times), I wouldn't call Cara because of the dodgy practises that have been recounted on here surrounding the phone lines on her sessions.
I use the TV shows to see who might be worth spending my money on online. (Thanks for your pretend interest btw.)
I don't see how this is relevant to your comment re. what was "seen" last night. Whether Cara put on a good show or not is not predicated on whether I called or not in any way.
What would you have like to have seen from Cara last night instead? Do tell us...
Okay, this isn't really directed at you, Shandyhand, because I know that you aren't one of those guys. But this comment has triggered a bit of a rant in me...
(29-06-2015 20:34 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ]I wouldn't call Cara because of the dodgy practises that have been recounted on here surrounding the phone lines on her sessions.
There is a small army of guys on this forum who -- either directly on indirectly -- have a go at callers because they make shows viable that they don't want to see.
I.e.
"we are DOOMED to see Lucy Anne tease hours because of a bunch of 'fanboy' callers who will keep that show going because they call in irrespective of whether she gets naked or not."
You know the schpeal.
Well, let me reverse it. As an (occasional) caller, I would argue that it doesn't help matters that this forum is willing to rhapsodise the performance of a girl whose show everyone KNOWS is ripping off callers.
The practice simply won't stop until enough people are warned off calling her. Unfortunately, every post in this thread that names-and-shames and warns people about what is going on at S66 is buried under a dozen posts that wax lyrical about what magnificent tits she has and how wonderful she is for getting them out.
It is just a personal opinion and I would never deign to dictate what others should or should not post. But I personally think that if you are not going to actively watch out for the caller who might be ripped off -- by putting girls like Cara Brett (and her producers) into the "sin bin" until they clean up their act -- then you should be disqualified from slagging off the "fanboy" who keeps afloat the shows you DON'T like. It cuts both ways.
(Once again, I think that you inadvertently walked into the firing line of that rant!
But, in the spirit of Wimbledon, that sentence was kind of a lob that I couldn't resist smashing back.)
exactly^ i used to be a caller of cara but got pissed off at being cut off for no reason, and by her bitching about what other girls were getting away with on other shows
so my point was directed more at the shows not the posters on here, yes cara may have been naked more than normal but the constant movement of camera and the fucking studio graphic popping up any time there was a mear sniff of pussy never mind a glimpse just pisses me off, as for the fan boys almost fainting at her being naked for 10mins longer than stated, if you want to see her gaping pussy just look at her pics, i wait with baited breath to see what happens in the next month or so when RLC packs up and babes move to different channels to see if these shows get any better but sadly i fear tis not long before the babe channels and the forum are a distant memory
Okay. Goodfella makes a good point re. not supporting the girls who prop up the dodgy phone tactics. I'm not sure me or anyone posting their individual reviews on here can effect the girls profitability particularly though. I doubt that this forum would be that powerful with mere posting blocks.
I also don't like the implication of trying to limit what and where people can post. (However you dress it up this is what your encouraging.) All parts of the argument for and against what each girl does and is like should be played out in each section. Let people judge and act for themselves on what they read.
@Rob169: If your point had been made in Goodfella's terms originally I would not have engaged your argument as I did. Even in your last post I don't think your arguments on the visuals hold any water. Posters where only surprised by the 10.50 nakedness not praising it and there was more than a sniff of what you were looking for in last nights show believe me.
(29-06-2015 23:03 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ]I also don't like the implication of trying to limit what and where people can post. (However you dress it up this is what your encouraging.) All parts of the argument for and against what each girl does and is like should be played out in each section. Let people judge and act for themselves on what they read.
Totally agree with this. My choice of words was poor.
I only meant to highlight the hint of hypocrisy in people that criticize the girl that does right by the caller (even if she pisses off the viewer), but are happy to praise the girl who does right by the viewer (but rips off the caller).
Next mini nightshow Sunday 10pm-12:30am.