You're right, but the point I'm making is that it's changed over the last couple of years. It used to be at the end of the market I like and had a great amateur feel, but now it's quality obsessed and almost posh. It's how the site has changed so much that I was commenting on.
Quality obsessed is not a bad thing in my opinion. One of the girls on there told me that they require a lot higher quality broadcasting than most cam sites. She needed a top-of-the-line webcam and a consistent upload speed over 1.5mb/s before she could meet their standards.
(21-01-2014 13:58 )7 stars of the orient Wrote: [ -> ]the lesbian couples seem to be the highlight here. Anyone looking for good lesbian action from seriously pretty girls isn't going to be disappointed.
The lesbians on livejasmin are super hot.
You can tell this by seeing how hard the lesbian couples are to get hold of, as they're in private chat most of the time.
(07-06-2015 10:49 )magdala Wrote: [ -> ]In my opinion the site's completely lost it's way.
I don't know why you say that. It rocks as far as I'm concerned as it has the best looking girls of any cam site.
(19-06-2015 22:11 )dave charleston Wrote: [ -> ]One of the girls on there told me that they require a lot higher quality broadcasting than most cam sites. She needed a top-of-the-line webcam and a consistent upload speed over 1.5mb/s before she could meet their standards.
It doesn't surprise me to hear that. The consistent video quality that you see always made it likely to me that they have some higher threshold than other cam sites. Good for them.
Live Jasmin has the best girls of any camsite, but they are also the best at stringing things out. It's happened to me a few times that in a private show the girl was slow to get naked and I had to nudge them along a bit, meaning that although the shows were great they turned out to be pricey.
(12-07-2015 13:54 )Robert E Lee Wrote: [ -> ] (19-06-2015 22:11 )dave charleston Wrote: [ -> ]One of the girls on there told me that they require a lot higher quality broadcasting than most cam sites. She needed a top-of-the-line webcam and a consistent upload speed over 1.5mb/s before she could meet their standards.
It doesn't surprise me to hear that. The consistent video quality that you see always made it likely to me that they have some higher threshold than other cam sites. Good for them.
I'm a model there and i think is a very good requirement because video quality means happy customers.
i must agree...memeber from 12 years...lastly always more addicted thank's to girls and video quality...but why girls you leave ? why?
the old skool babes were the best;
Incredibleme ; Magnifique ; Pulya_ua
Not quite the same nowadays
I see a few comments about the video quality on LiveJasmin. Well the reason it's consistently good is simply that the technical requirements are so very stringent on this site, meaning the girls must have top-notch equipment to even get on here in the first place. I've not seen any other webcam site that enforces high standards/specifications in this way.