The UK Babe Channels Forum

darn what a bummer

According to her Twitter looks like she's off on a another holiday - this time New Zealand for a month.

^ ANOTHER ?!? How in the hell can she afford to go on holidays every other week ? She must get paid more - dayshows OR nights - than anyone else. Unless, of course, the rumours about her are tr......Nah, not a chance of THAT

(03-10-2016 16:16 )Robot Devil Wrote: [ -> ]^ ANOTHER ?!? How in the hell can she afford to go on holidays every other week ? She must get paid more - dayshows OR nights - than anyone else. Unless, of course, the rumours about her are tr......Nah, not a chance of THAT

What rumours are these? Should I save me pennies up? ?

(03-10-2016 16:16 )Robot Devil Wrote: [ -> ]^ ANOTHER ?!? How in the hell can she afford to go on holidays every other week ? She must get paid more - dayshows OR nights - than anyone else. Unless, of course, the rumours about her are tr......Nah, not a chance of THAT

Before she started modelling she owned horses - not sure if she still does. Parents live in a large detached house in an expensive area. Think she isn't short of a bob or two, with or without the modelling.

Just had an interesting conversation about her with her former gymnastics coach, who also used to be my sisters coach.

I met him in the local garden centre (which incidentally has the same name as Flick's real surname! - don't think that Flicks family have anything to do with it though).

He asked how things were going and mentioned he was interested to know what former gymnasts were up to. So I tentatively brought up the name of Flick, and was surprised that he knew all about her activities.

I was amazed, because I thought he was very straight-laced, that he had no problem with her being a glamour model, because" in the past it has been a quite honourable profession e.g. Sam Fox and Linda Lusadi" - he was however worried that nowadays girls are expected to be more explicit, bordering on pornographic, in what they show/do. What really surprised me was that he said he had no real problem with her doing night shows, because that's got to be better than "what she was doing on the pervert cam , and those videos she did watching guys masturbating" . He asked would many of the guys who watch those videos be happy to see their own sisters/daughters doing that sort of thing?.

When I showed surprise he knew about that he said he was a member of a private-invite rugby fans site, and one of the members called himself "Flicks No1 Fan", and kept posting pics videos etc - including "pervert cam " videos he had taken.

He also said that, although he hadn't talked to her in years they still acknowledge each other, usually when driving past.

So my questions are:
1) Does the No1 fan also post on here? If so can I see the "pervertcam" videos
2) Are those comments about modelling the norm from someone in their late 60s? - I had the impression that people of that age would be more disapproving.

If anyone knows about this invite only Rugby fans site, can you drop me a PM? I have fucking tonnes to trade of all the girls, thanks!

(07-10-2016 14:04 )jomny Wrote: [ -> ]If anyone knows about this invite only Rugby fans site, can you drop me a PM? I have fucking tonnes to trade of all the girls, thanks!

I think he said it was by invite only for people who have had a "professional" link with higher end rugby. He has helped a few clubs with fitness and flexibility training.

Sounded like the main discussion is all rugby related, but there is a more general section where virtually anything, that is legal, is discussed, and the bit about Flick is on that.

She's on at the moment, but, as she did her last show, looks disinterested.

It's as though she's had enough of the (daytime?) babeshows.

Couldn't agree more. She needs to do another Night Show,get her juices and our juices flowing