The UK Babe Channels Forum

(06-09-2009 15:17 )TheWatcher Wrote: [ -> ]Some recent screenshots

Click on any picture to enlarge
[URL=http://www.imagechunk.com/viewer.php?file=4h6mqnx7sh6eq2vdns28.jpg][IMG]

Hi... can anyone tell me who this luscious babe is? I've only recently started watching what's around on the net... omg she's so luscious.

Hmmm... previewing the post doesn't seem to bring up the pic I tried to isolate. She's on the second row of pictures in the post I quoted...

Any help?

And thanks to the Watcher and many others for making this forum what it is.

(07-09-2009 11:47 )DiduHearThat Wrote: [ -> ]
[URL=http://www.imagebam.com]Free

Ok maybe this'll work... who IS she?

Some previously unposted screenshots from the last 9 days

Click on any picture to enlarge











Free Adult Image Host - ImageChunk.com

If all the pictures in the previous post are not the same size and 3 in a row, it is because of a problem with the picture hosting site at present.
Hopefully it will be fixed soon.

These screenshots were all from the last 7 days of September.
The 2 big pics of Adele and Sarah Lou are very nice.




Click on any picture to enlarge or see the slideshow at full size











free image host

[quote='TheWatcher' pid='236207' dateline='1254406326']
These screenshots were all from the last 7 days of September.
The 2 big pics of Adele and Sarah Lou are very nice.

Great tho those shots,and subject matter are,(i like the idea of an omnibus of whats been on in say, the last month) Im not keen on caps from the webstream,as,despite the lack of a banner, they come up much smaller and lower quality. It is however, just my opinion

(01-10-2009 15:27 )stilettos Wrote: [ -> ][quote='TheWatcher' pid='236207' dateline='1254406326']
These screenshots were all from the last 7 days of September.
The 2 big pics of Adele and Sarah Lou are very nice.

Great tho those shots,and subject matter are,(i like the idea of an omnibus of whats been on in say, the last month) Im not keen on caps from the webstream,as,despite the lack of a banner, they come up much smaller and lower quality. It is however, just my opinion

I can't disagree about the lower quality, but (as I'm sure Toni here would agree), if you work with the size you're given...they can be made a lot bigger with some coaxing.
Go on... touch it and see...

(01-10-2009 16:56 )Soixante Smurf Wrote: [ -> ]I can't disagree about the lower quality, but (as I'm sure Toni here would agree), if you work with the size you're given...they can be made a lot bigger with some coaxing.
Go on... touch it and see...

Excellent! And thats a great shot! Did you make it bigger in photoshop? I thought about doing that, but if the quality was low res,it might make it look worse, yours seems to be fine! (p.s. you have a different logo in the left corner, did it come from somewhere else? The other caps just have it underneath,allowing it to be cropped out? )

I took this one of Lynsey just now by 'full-screening' the webstream, and print-screening the shot, but as you see its only 25 odd kb, so wont make a good screensaver or anything. Im guessing thats not how you did it!? s [attachment=9980]

(01-10-2009 17:00 )stilettos Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-10-2009 16:56 )Soixante Smurf Wrote: [ -> ]I can't disagree about the lower quality, but (as I'm sure Toni here would agree), if you work with the size you're given...they can be made a lot bigger with some coaxing.
Go on... touch it and see...

Excellent! And thats a great shot! Did you make it bigger in photoshop? I thought about doing that, but if the quality was low res,it might make it look worse, yours seems to be fine! (p.s. you have a different logo in the left corner, did it come from somewhere else? The other caps just have it underneath,allowing it to be cropped out? )

It is not allowed to post any screenshots without a TeaseMeTV logo.

I can't see how my screenshots can be made larger without getting worse quality.
I am using desktop capture software, and so the resolution is not adjustable. It is what it is.