The UK Babe Channels Forum

Best tits on the planet, Dionne. Instant hard-on everytime I see 'em

Lucky that i turned over to see who was On Elite tonight as i would have missed Dionne otherwise as she wasn't scheduled to be on tonight but is looking great in her grey vest with a black bra underneath

(05-06-2011 01:18 )Roquentin Wrote: [ -> ]Just watched Dionne tease a little with the g-string

Ok what do you think the reason is why Dionne hasnt really removed her g-string and gone fully naked on show? I know there are some debatable times when she did sort of, but since then. Got to be careful now, someone (Wazo?) may actually know the answer (or maybe buried deep in the thread), but here are some possibilities I thought up: (clue 4, 5 and 6 aren't believable, 3 and 7 are my hopeful fantasy)

1 Dionne has her limits and this would go beyond her personal choice
2 She doesnt want the crew and producers to get an eyeful of herself
3 Elitetv are keeping it as an ace up their sleeves, to bring out in case they need an instant win!
4 No one at Elitetv has ever thought about it
5 No caller has ever asked
6 She does it lots of times but I keep missing it (as do the cappers)
7 She is just building up to it very very slowly

To answer you question Roquentin i dont know the proper answer but in my opinion i would probably say its the first option that you listed that she has her limits an that would go beyond her personal choice.

I think Dionne has gone lame from when she first started on Elite....... but she isn't the only one in my opinion I also think Ashley Emma has gone down hill from when she first came from the daytime show to the night time.....my reasons for saying this is they look totally bored Ashley never really moves she just lies there with an occational wiggle of her arse, and Dionne isn't much better I wished she was like she was when she first started..... I think the only girls that push the bounds are Sophia Knight, Charlie o' Neal and Caty Cole.....I joined Elite online thinking the girls might go a step further as it's a subscription site but they are no different on there in fact it's boardering on a rip off..................

(05-06-2011 01:18 )Roquentin Wrote: [ -> ]Just watched Dionne tease a little with the g-string

Ok what do you think the reason is why Dionne hasnt really removed her g-string and gone fully naked on show? I know there are some debatable times when she did sort of, but since then. Got to be careful now, someone (Wazo?) may actually know the answer (or maybe buried deep in the thread), but here are some possibilities I thought up: (clue 4, 5 and 6 aren't believable, 3 and 7 are my hopeful fantasy)

1 Dionne has her limits and this would go beyond her personal choice
2 She doesnt want the crew and producers to get an eyeful of herself
3 Elitetv are keeping it as an ace up their sleeves, to bring out in case they need an instant win!
4 No one at Elitetv has ever thought about it
5 No caller has ever asked
6 She does it lots of times but I keep missing it (as do the cappers)
7 She is just building up to it very very slowly

Well seeing as she goes nude (Not frontal) on the website, I'd have to go with 1-3. Her limits could include not feeling comfortable going nude on live TV, though she's shown bum before, and if she did go nude her hand would be in place, which makes me suspect #2. Perhaps she doesn't want anyone there to see her naughty bits when she's getting into different positions, as it would be hard to cover herself perfectly all of the time. Someone is bound to see something. #3 is a possibility as well, but doubtful seeing as Elite was quite poor for most of this year, especially the first few months, so they would have used it already.

Consensus:

1 and 2. Both could go together.

(05-06-2011 23:39 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]Well seeing as she goes nude (Not frontal) on the website, I'd have to go with 1-3. Her limits could include not feeling comfortable going nude on live TV, though she's shown bum before, and if she did go nude her hand would be in place, which makes me suspect #2. Perhaps she doesn't want anyone there to see her naughty bits when she's getting into different positions, as it would be hard to cover herself perfectly all of the time. Someone is bound to see something. #3 is a possibility as well, but doubtful seeing as Elite was quite poor for most of this year, especially the first few months, so they would have used it already.

Consensus:

1 and 2. Both could go together.

Hmm think you may be right there Mrmann its probably is a combination of the first two options in Roquentin post.

Dionne is actually quite funny on the mic when she wants to be her comment when someone threw a pair of Rachel's pants at her was i will have to sniff them in a minute

There might be other options.

8. She knows deep down that it gets repetative after a while, she is permanently keeping some room to travel in our imagination.

Funny discussion. Seriously guys stop and think about it.
Do you really think elite have sat Dionne down and had a 'chat' ... "now then, we know you're dead keen to drop your knickers, but we think there's a marketing opportunity for us here somewhere down the line if the wheels are seriously coming off the business. Leave the knickers firmly in place until we give you the secret password, then and only then can they come off".

And being worried about the crew seeing her bits. Nah, don't buy it, have you seen the sets there, like a small booth with the camera at the front, it's pretty darn easy to be naked, butt pointing away from camera, and no-one will be seeing anything. Hardly likely to be a major consideration, especially as she goes naked for the web videos, surely easier for the crew to get an eyeful then.

Almost certainly she just doesn't choose to do that, plain and simple, same as all the other night girls on all the channels that don't get naked. Some choose to do it and are comfortable with that, others are not, no mystery or sub-plot involved.
There's a difference between doing a live show naked, and doing a photo or scripted film shoot where 'accidents' can be cut out, and the whole thing presented in a more 'artistic' way, a bit like the actresses who get their kit off for a movie, but they don't go posing for the top shelf mags!

End of the day, it's all about call volumes, that's what earns the dollars. Call volumes may be influenced by the on-screen performance, but that doesn't necessarily mean 'get naked = more calls'. There are a number of girls who work in the porn industry, so are used to getting naked for a living, but on the babechannels, they tend not to strip completely very often, Lolly Badcock, Ree Petra, and Elite's own Sophia Knight to name a few. That doesn't mean their performance isn't up to scratch, quite the opposite, they are top perfomers despite keeping their pants on, arguably they put in a better performance for being clothed, as they have more freedom of movement and can be more daring in the positions they assume as there is no danger of flashing.
Being naked on screen may satisfy some of the viewers, but viewers aren't earning the company money!

It's all about the tease, keeping a bit back for your imagination to work on, and Dionne does that as well as anyone

munch

(06-06-2011 00:54 )Roquentin Wrote: [ -> ]There might be other options.

8. She knows deep down that it gets repetative after a while, she is permanently keeping some room to travel in our imagination.

It doesn't get repetitive for me. NOT going nude gets repetitive.

To munch, funny you mention stuff being edited out of the site videos, because there was a moment when Dionne appeared to go down on the cameraman in her removed broken down vid ( I agree with Jamie for removing it by the way), yet in the video this is cut out using a cross fade. Maybe they didn't want to show that for some reason, though I doubt you could see anything anyway if it was for real. Apparently other members saw this moment, so it's possible they snipped this scene before removing the vid altogether. Why allude to something only to cut it out of the video? I don't get it.

(06-06-2011 01:22 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]To munch, funny you mention stuff being edited out of the site videos, because there was a moment when Dionne appeared to go down on the cameraman in her removed broken down vid ( I agree with Jamie for removing it by the way), yet in the video this is cut out using a cross fade. Maybe they didn't want to show that for some reason, though I doubt you could see anything anyway if it was for real.

"... if it was for real", what, you mean if Dionne was really giving the camera-man a blowjob?
I think you seriously misunderstand, Dionne is most definitely not a porn star, she was most definitely not giving a bj, it was an illusion, designed to put the thought in your head, all part of the tease.

(06-06-2011 01:22 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]Apparently other members saw this moment, so it's possible they snipped this scene before removing the vid altogether. Why allude to something only to cut it out of the video? I don't get it.

Again, I repeat, it's there to tease, to create an illusion, you show the viewer half an image, and let them fill the rest in themselves.
I'll let you in on a secret, when the girls on screen do a 2-4-1, and they are kissing and feeling each other up, doesn't mean they are lesbians in real life, they are just putting on an act for the audience.
Elite is not a porn company, and the girls who work there are not all porn stars, and the videos they create for the website are not porn videos, they are cheeky, saucy and a little bit naughty, nothing more nothing less. If it's full-on spread-legged nudity you want you really need to head over to Sexstation or Babestation Xtreme, or one of the foreign babechannels.

munch

(06-06-2011 02:04 )munch1917 Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-06-2011 01:22 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]To munch, funny you mention stuff being edited out of the site videos, because there was a moment when Dionne appeared to go down on the cameraman in her removed broken down vid ( I agree with Jamie for removing it by the way), yet in the video this is cut out using a cross fade. Maybe they didn't want to show that for some reason, though I doubt you could see anything anyway if it was for real.

"... if it was for real", what, you mean if Dionne was really giving the camera-man a blowjob?
I think you seriously misunderstand, Dionne is most definitely not a porn star, she was most definitely not giving a bj, it was an illusion, designed to put the thought in your head, all part of the tease.

(06-06-2011 01:22 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]Apparently other members saw this moment, so it's possible they snipped this scene before removing the vid altogether. Why allude to something only to cut it out of the video? I don't get it.

Again, I repeat, it's there to tease, to create an illusion, you show the viewer half an image, and let them fill the rest in themselves.
I'll let you in on a secret, when the girls on screen do a 2-4-1, and they are kissing and feeling each other up, doesn't mean they are lesbians in real life, they are just putting on an act for the audience.
Elite is not a porn company, and the girls who work there are not all porn stars, and the videos they create for the website are not porn videos, they are cheeky, saucy and a little bit naughty, nothing more nothing less. If it's full-on spread-legged nudity you want you really need to head over to Sexstation or Babestation Xtreme, or one of the foreign babechannels.

munch

No, I agree with you, to a certain extent, but Elite DOES do porn, at least G/G porn, just not tons of it.

You're right, Dionne is NOT a porn star, which is why I wrote that you likely wouldn't have been able to see anything if she was really doing this. Just because a woman isn't a porn star, doesn't mean she'd be against actually doing something as long as it wasn't shown. Know what I mean. We don't these women personally, which is why I said IF. The version I saw had this edited out, yet other people who saw it when it was first released said it had not been edited.

As for wanting spread legged nudity, well my guess is that MOST of the viewers/callers want the same thing. Sorry, but it's true. These are 18 rated channels that are able to be locked for safety, yet we can't see a normal body part??? It's past time already and not exactly extreme content either. I'm not expecting this, I just feel it should be allowed, and up for the women and producers to decide on when and what to show.