The UK Babe Channels Forum

(24-11-2020 23:10 )KerrAvon Wrote: [ -> ]She looks great in that white lace

Agree, Mia looked fantastic in her white lace & for me did a fantastic show including some very hot nakedness

Babe Of The Night for me

Is she allergic to the leaves now sprawled on the sauna set? Seems odd.

^^
Don’t know but what I do know is Mia looked stunning in her lingerie & didn’t dissapoint every time she was on screen

Although Mia is my favourite on these channels. Too often, she hardly moves around, at all.
If she's not, sat on the edge, of that table, on the shiny silver set, for half-hour-plus! She's lying down, for half-hour-plus!
As I've mentioned elsewhere, I don't see the point, of their being knickerless, when on tv. As it limits, how much they can move around, for the tv camera.
But it's not only when Mia is knickerless, that's she's almost stationary.
As good as she's sometimes been, on BS. She moved around, much more, when she was on 66. Albeit, sometimes partially obscured, by its oversized, graphic banner!

(25-11-2020 08:58 )seducedx6 Wrote: [ -> ]

(24-10-2020 02:29 )seducedx6 Wrote: [ -> ]What is going on with BS's published schedule?!
Not for the first time, there is no sign, of a number of women, included in the schedule!

Earlier, in her Instagram story, Mia was watching one of the Child's Play films. Giving no sign of being on BS, as per the published schedule!

I used to check the BS schedule, after 01:00, when the next day's was published. Unless I'm mistaken, BS started publishing a month's schedule, in advance, only in recent months. Since then, there have been so many instances of non-appearances, that I think it's more of a problem with the schedule/rs, than with the women themselves.

The other two operators do manage, to update, and revise, their schedule, sometimes.
But BS have gone from publishing, only the current day's schedule, to giving a whole month's schedule, uniquely. At least, indicated on the individual women's pages. Without updating and revising them.

I missed a surprise appearance, by my favourite, in my favourite kind of outfit
I hope Mia wears the white lace outfit, again, next time.
I didn't look at the schedule, after morning. Mia certainly wasn't added to the schedule then.
But I hadn't looked at Twitter, for a couple days. That's usually, more reliably up to date.

This follows on, from those two previous posts.
Before the last hour or so, I hadn't looked at the BS schedule, or Mia's BS page, since no later, than early on Saturday afternoon. Indeed, I hadn't been online, at all, during that time.
Up to when I saw it, on Saturday, Mia was scheduled to be on, both Sunday and Monday nights. Yet, there was no sign of her, on tv ('Freeview'), on Sunday. And again, no sign tonight.
Looking on her BS page, there are no tips, which excepting, the unlikely instance, of her getting none, means she hasn't even been online, exclusively, on either night.
Plus, it still indicates, that Mia is scheduled to be on tonight!?
As I've said, in the earliest post, quoted above, I don't think these non-appearances are the fault of the women, but the schedulers. As it's happened, too many times, with too many different women.
Perhaps BS should revert, to publishing details of only one day's schedule, in advance!?

(27-11-2020 09:13 )Doddle Wrote: [ -> ]Is she allergic to the leaves now sprawled on the sauna set? Seems odd.

No, clearly not. By 4 she seemed a bit flat

keeping track of her screen time is a challenge. Literally disappears and reappears whenever.

Mind boggling

A wonderful Wednesday night from Mia last night including some incredibly hot nakedness

Babe Of The Night

Mia looked amazing naked and oiled up lastnight, love it when shes twerking her gorgeous peachy bum,

(03-12-2020 12:24 )manstyle12 Wrote: [ -> ]keeping track of her screen time is a challenge. Literally disappears and reappears whenever.

Mind boggling

If memory serves, she was off tv ('Freeview'), for nearly two hours, and then, suddenly turned up, backstage/on webcam, after 01:00.
However, Mia is not alone, on BS, in suddenly dis/reappearing.
It is puzzling.. but I do wonder if it's related, at all, to what I've written recently, about her being one of the those, recurrently appearing, misleadingly, in BS's frustrating, published schedule.
Even 66's crammed schedule, is considerably more up-to-date, and accurate!