(15-04-2013 14:22 )stagmonkey Wrote: [ -> ]well, if she 'deteriorates' into escorting I'll keep her employed 
Well, it's not exactly becoming a brian surgeon. Fucking ANY sweaty old man for a few quid. I don't think people quite get that bit, she'd have to fuck any one who slaped their cash on the table, even me! No life for a young beautiful girl.
Of course I'm not saying that will happen, probbaly won't, but that sight does seem to have alot of that and apparently that's where she's a earning all her dosh from hereonin.
I think maybe she joined CG because a couple of her friends were working there now they have left she probably decided to go the same way.
Said shes doing Aw full time so she will prob make as much as she makes on tv anyway
I would think the problem with only being on cam is that it's more difficult to grow your fan base. Compared to a platform like AW, even the (specialised) 900 channels reach a very large audience, allowing a presenter to gain new fans.
In these tough economic times, camming is expensive for most people - you'd need to be a "hardcore" fan to pay for cam sessions on a regular basis.
I hope Charley does well, but I'm not convinced she'll be able to make enough money just working on AW.
BTW, I wasn't convinced she'd just decided to give up the babe channels. I have a feeling there might have been a bust-up of some kind with CG.
(16-04-2013 11:25 )HannahsPet Wrote: [ -> ]Said shes doing Aw full time so she will prob make as much as she makes on tv anyway
well the difference between cam and tv is that doesnt cost them to travel there and they can choose there own hours. daytime girls are on about £20-40 an hour (well thats on one channel guessing will be the same for the rest) thats about 2 cams an hour. so guessing she only needs 10 hard core fans a day and shes made up what shes made at the studios but in the privacy of her own home. you see a lot of the girls on adultwork now and the 1's i cam are usally busy so cant be that bad
They might not earn as much as you think.
I use to talk on yahoo messanger to a Russian cam woman, no cam involved just the msg.
This was 2006 and they charged 1.50 a min, can't remember if that was dollers or pounds, anyway, she recieved 35p/c of that ONLY when she got a call. That is she got a percentage of the actually calls. I use to watch her has her head moved from screen to screen, look to be on 4 of them.
Most of the time there were no callers and she was there all night, and trying to do a job in the day poor girl was run into the ground. Luckily she got a good job I think working for the government and was able to leave.
Course I burnt my bridges with her when she came back from a SEVENTY minute session. I asked it if was a nude one she said no just talk, I goes, blimey I talk to you longer than that for nothing
Course never heard from her again, I genuinly liked her as well, wonder what she's doing now.
Sure she could manage that on a good day - but 10 (different) hard-core fans every day... I wonder?
(17-04-2013 09:12 )HannahsPet Wrote: [ -> ]...so guessing she only needs 10 hard core fans a day and shes made up what shes made at the studios but in the privacy of her own home...
I suppose it's pretty logical, if cams where SO lucrative and the people watching them were very happy with the poor quaity image then Sky channels wouldn't exist becasue all the models would be doing caming from the comfort of their own homes.
Only thing cam might offer over one of the free channels is harder content.
Billshoneys? never heard of them