Would that it were only once in a blue moon, that someone indicated their not knowing the difference between plain and clear language... especially when they offer a "strangely, overly complex" interpretation of their own point....
In my view, the most objectionable post by queenhazel, was where he said that Hazel "looked haggard", possibly "drunk or just very tired".
(13-07-2023 09:01 )seducedx6 Wrote: [ -> ]Would that it were only once in a blue moon, that someone indicated their not knowing the difference between plain and clear language... especially when they offer a "strangely, overly complex" interpretation of their own point....
In my view, the most objectionable post by queenhazel, was where he said that Hazel "looked haggard", possibly "drunk or just very tired".
TBH I'm still none the wiser so I've withdrawn my thanks as a precaution.
Once you stop speaking in riddles I'll perhaps reconsider.
I think Hazel's been great recently. I do like other girls on Xpanded, but the last couple of times I've seen Hazel she really caught my attention.
"Strange" how bluemoon99 did not mention my "overly complex original post", when quoting it..
I'm not "speaking"(!), and the attempt to spin the post I quoted from, is more of a (Jimmy) "riddle" to me..
My previous post should be clear enough, to moderately, worldly intelligent people on an adult forum, which makes me think that I'm not just expected to spoon-feed the background to my posts, available by mostly looking through the last few pages or so of this thread, but my help is being sought in diverting attention from the post that I quoted, which was evidently a blunder at best....
(13-07-2023 08:50 )crankshaft Wrote: [ -> ] (11-07-2023 17:25 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]Yep. I've said this too. No problem with them being passionate supporting Hazel, but I do have a problem with them putting down & belittling the xpanded babies who Hazel work with.
As you say, they put in the time and effort just like Hazel & don't deserve those comments
QueenHazel didn’t actually put down or belittle the other babes on the channel in that post to be fair. He was putting down and belittling fanboys of other babes.
Post 575 was one of his pearls of wisdom....
Sexiest face, sexiest body, most vibrant personality. Sexiest overall package. Even her attire is the sexiest too. Personally i think there is massive gap between her and the rest of the pack......
As a so called "fanboy" I'm used to getting grief on here so can take his nonsense. But some of the girls whose livelihood literally depends on their popularity (ie phone calls to them rather than the other girl at the time) probably don't take too kindly to someone like Dicky slating them off on the rather spurious grounds that they are a 'massive gap' behind Big H (of all people) Like I've said many times before, each to their own but there's never any good reason to diss the other girls
^You're absolutely correct. Bella Baby took exception to this person's posts a while ago where they praise Hazel and belittle/look down on the other Xpanded babes
She's a really beautiful lady. Reminds me of the beautiful women & actresses from the 50s,60s,70s
Amazing show last night from the curvy mancunian mamma!
(16-07-2023 13:13 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]^You're absolutely correct. Bella Baby took exception to this person's posts a while ago where they praise Hazel and belittle/look down on the other Xpanded babes
Really? Why would Bella Baby have concerned herself with comments made about the Xpanded ladies in threads about them in the Xpanded section of the forum? Unless of course hazelqueen referred to Hazel on Bella’s thread. Did he? But that is a different issue. The recent argument between Seducedx6 and Bluemoon99 was over queenhazel’s post putting down fanboys of other babes (as opposed to his own fanboy worship).
