the schedule has been a joke for the last 3 weeks or so. i mean its not like we have anything better to do than hang about waiting on them to show up. (sarcasm)
frankly its laughable the way they try to treat there customers... so laughable in fact i went and spent my money on naughty chat with madison within 2 mins she was naked and rubbing putting on a show that would put these clowns to shame...
me i say fuck em if they cant be assed to show up then spend your money elsewhere and see how quickly they sort there shit out.
get a refund on your credits as to there mind if you have credits on your vucall you will wait and spend when they do eventually turn up.
I think I only really stuck around S66 webcams for Caty, so when she jumped to BS. I think a good chunk of us left with her.
I mean, aside from her, all the other S66 girls are pretty softcore at best with a few that flash for a chunk of tips.
I made a comment some time ago about the madness of allowing the models to set their own webcam rate.
One is still seeing certain girls charging as much as 40 credits a minute. Of course the channel might also think the more they charge, the more we earn but it can also be quite counter-productive.
Case in point earlier today when Cara started her show at 35 and wondered where the guys were. She soon dropped the price to 20 and then to 15 but the damage was already done since I suspect the early viewers did not check back and the show finished early.
It's not rocket science to appreciate that 3 viewers paying 15 earn both model and studio more than one paying 35. Pure 'greed' could well kill this 'Golden Goose'.
wasnt just that mate. the chatbox went tits up about 10 mins before her show started so the guys couldnt chat to her.
she was shouting at them to send her tweets because she couldnt see there text. at the time there was about 10 guys in the room who she gave a shout out to. 5 mins or so later it was fixed but there wasnt any 1 left to see it. she hung around for a while after then went off and looked pissed for the rest of the afternoon.
What I find strange about the studio66 webcam is how they allow the girls to promote their own account at adultworks while they are live at studio66.
The same goes for the quality. It seems it just keep getting worse and worse for each time they are online because they don't have enough bandwidth to deliver
videofeed too two seperate webcam sites like studio66 and Adultwork at the same time.
Making the ppm higher and the quality lower don't make me wanna use studio66 and I rather go and chat with the girls at adultchat when the quality is much better.
And as far as I discovered I'm not the only one who select to go to adultwork instead then studio66 when they girls are online at both places.
mate they have more than enough bandwidth they deliberately degrade the image to discourage guys using screen capping software and then upping the results to tubesites. which is unfair on the other guys paying to watch...
but really thats not the problem. check out little miss winters. shes charging £'s per minute and just lying there waiting for guys to tip only then will she turn on the charm... sorry darling i aint paying to watch you browse your mobile.
s66 really need to knock this shit on the head. these girls are supposed to be making the channel money, but instead are giving it a bad rep.
(20-11-2014 16:41 )HEX!T Wrote: [ -> ]mate they have more than enough bandwidth they deliberately degrade the image to discourage guys using screen capping software and then upping the results to tubesites. which is unfair on the other guys paying to watch...
but really thats not the problem. check out little miss winters. shes charging £'s per minute and just lying there waiting for guys to tip only then will she turn on the charm... sorry darling i aint paying to watch you browse your mobile.
s66 really need to knock this shit on the head. these girls are supposed to be making the channel money, but instead are giving it a bad rep.
Yep all of the above is well named Stupido66
(20-11-2014 16:41 )HEX!T Wrote: [ -> ]mate they have more than enough bandwidth they deliberately degrade the image to discourage guys using screen capping software and then upping the results to tubesites. which is unfair on the other guys paying to watch...
You sure that point? I'd say before the move to the new webcam system, the tubesites had some, but not a continuous stream of new/current shows being uploaded to them. Seeing some of the webshows on the tubesites was more an oddity.
Seems like what they did was extremely not effective contrasting what I was seeing before to the current now on the tubesites.
not sure what you mean mate...
yeah im sure. the first vids upped to the tubesites were all pretty much capped with the likes of bandicam.
later guys figured out rtmp recording and the quality got a bit better. then the girls found out and thats when the cam quality dropped off dramatically. its never been great to be honest but it has gotten worse for some girls in particular.
when the girls are at home then yeah its possible they wont have enough bandwidth to run the cam as london and manchester still have areas where bt has done nothing to improve speeds. but in the studio where most of the cam shows are produced they will be broadcast to the servers on the studios net, which should be business class. these are also used to supply the tv and that image doesnt break up anywhere near as badly. so really there is no excuse for degraded imaged quality due to bandwidth limitations from studio broadcasts.
your not actually connecting directly to the girls cam (thats potentially a security concern) but rather the girls broadcast to a server and the server then dishes it out to the client. you then pay for the bandwidth used at the end of the month/quarter.
you can also check out the screen format they use. instead of using a normal 720/450 800kbps 25fps they are often 500/1000 450-650 kbsp @ 18fps. result is hitching.
i dontr know of any webcam that comes with a 1/2 ratio settings as default?
every cam i ever had was a minimum 25fps some up to 30fps.
all had a larger horizontal and small vertical (16/9 in most cases, 5/4 in some) but the ratio the girls tend to use is a 1/2 which forces the codec to stretch the horizontal and shrink the vertical which results in blocking every time the girls so much as move there hands.
you can see the same issues with certain girls on babestation.
cam was fine in the afternoon naked chat private show.
lori and ashley come in to do a special and the same cam was unwatchable.
the only difference was the settings had been changed again from 19/6 to 1/2, turning the pixels from horizontal format to vertical with the express intention of degrading the picture.
the producer was unaware of this as they didnt put it rite till some1 complained the following afternoon. the cam was used from 7am so if they knew they would have reset it as they were trying to launch a new service.
just for reference i have a 54Mb line so i know its not my end. i can run all the channels in there own tabs in opera all at 1s and they play smooth.
i was also given access to a couple of capped rtmp recordings both from the same cam taken on different days.
1 was decent the other blocky. the only difference was the screen format and bitrate.
so yeah the evidence i have seen tells me its deliberate.
(14-11-2014 19:45 )TickleTheOrc Wrote: [ -> ]If you didn't notice with Gemma Hiles and Hanna Martin, they usually cam on 2 or more websites at the same time. So attention to you might be non-existent depending on which site you are taking them on.
Gemma Hiles is currently shown as "In Private" on S66 Cams.
Meanwhile, on Adultwork and MFC, she's in Group Shows. That doesn't meet my definition of Private.