^^^^ This is what I want to see
just having a laugh!
Disclaimer: The image is a mock up & not actually any known forum member (I think
)
(23-07-2013 08:59 )HannahsPet Wrote: [ -> ]I for one think its better if porn filters are on. makes it harder work to get porn plus its more satisfying when get hands on it its a major 2 fingers up to Cameron
your making out like this is another of your stealth military operations to hack into the wifi while walking round you local branch of Dorothy Perkins.
All you need to do is switch your family filter to "off", David Cameron accepts this
(22-07-2013 19:22 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]Today is the day when the UK officially became a nanny state.
But why is that? Why didn't the introduction of adult filtering on phones make the UK a nanny state?
I don't understand what all the fuss is about. All it means is clicking on a box to say you don't want the safety block on. Of course adults should have their choice...and this will remain the case, but young children should certainly be protected from adult material. Its not censorship as they are not stopping the viewing of porn but simply protecting young eyes, through making it less readily viewable.
The authorities should however look into the disturbing lack of parental responsibility in our society. It would be far simpler to ensure no child was sat alone and unsupervised with a PC, then there might be no need for this action.
If i tick yes will my name be on database as someone who watches porn? It could stop me from getting a decent job in the future or maybe family or a girl could gogle my name and see that i watch xxx? Not happy, goverment database has been hacked before. Think i will stick to dvds.
(24-07-2013 18:05 )bytor Wrote: [ -> ]I don't understand what all the fuss is about. All it means is clicking on a box to say you don't want the safety block on. Of course adults should have their choice...and this will remain the case, but young children should certainly be protected from adult material. Its not censorship as they are not stopping the viewing of porn but simply protecting young eyes, through making it less readily viewable.
The authorities should however look into the disturbing lack of parental responsibility in our society. It would be far simpler to ensure no child was sat alone and unsupervised with a PC, then there might be no need for this action.
agree all round bytor. I cant see what all the fuss is about and also agree about parental responsibility. these days parents want the government/state to do everything for them and take as little responsibility as possible
Very good picture manipulation - The Truth
Only thing is I look nothing like that man, I've never worn a see you Jimmy hat in my fucking life. I do own a kilt however which I reserve only for 2 occasion's. Weddings and going abroad as the women love it
I always have a laugh when I see sterotyping taking place. For a start I have short dark brown hair which I like to keep well groomed. I also have a liking for wearing designer clothes too and I wouldn't be seen dead looking like that guy in the picture
All I have to say is that I hope David Cameron and the tories aswell as his sidekick puppet Nick Clegg get fucking annihilated in the next general election. This latest move is just the last straw for this ever increasing nanny state.
Also like I said, do you really want your name to be put on a database, watching porn is not ilegal but this latest move is just going to put a stigma on it. Infact I'd go as far to say that it's blatant discrimination and is a form of humilation and degrades you as a human being.
BTW - This is all your getting out of me tonight, I'm fucking knackered and I have to get up early tommorow again so it looks likes I'll be missing out on all of the hot pussyfest (not) action again on the telly tonight (if only)
(24-07-2013 18:11 )sala Wrote: [ -> ]If i tick yes will my name be on database as someone who watches porn?
My phone is adult verified, but I have never dialled any adult service, so my opting in to adult material proves nothing.
(24-07-2013 18:11 )sala Wrote: [ -> ]If i tick yes will my name be on database as someone who watches porn?
Maybe I'm a simpleton, but I don't see how anyone could keep such a database. If someone only watches porn once a month and only deactivates the adult filter once a month, how can anyone know that he needs to be on the database? Or that any porn was watched in the time the adult filter was deactivated?
(24-07-2013 20:47 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]Also like I said, do you really want your name to be put on a database, watching porn is not ilegal but this latest move is just going to put a stigma on it. Infact I'd go as far to say that it's blatant discrimination and is a form of humilation and degrades you as a human being.
BTW - This is all your getting out of me tonight, I'm fucking knackered and I have to get up early tommorow again so it looks likes I'll be missing out on all of the hot pussyfest (not) action again on the telly tonight (if only)
do you not think the government (and probably authorities overseas as well) already have your name on databases?
watching porn (and or babestation) has ALWAYS had a stigma to it this is nothing new!, which is why you dont find families sitting down to watch it, which is why magazines are on shelves high up, which is why dvds have to be bought from specialist retailers, which is why its discreet on your travel-lodge bill the next morning etc etc.
As for the last part, you really seem to hate these shows, perhaps its just time you found a new hobby or interest that didnt make you such a paranoid misery?