The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: Should wireless headsets be standard issue for all Babeshows?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3
Isn't it about time all of the Babeshows used headsets?

I used to watch Dirty Talk, and the freedom that it gave the girls was incredible. They were able to get into new positions and appeared more comfortable in the old ones - being up on all fours wasn't a problem. It also freed up another hand for simulation (even though Ofcomannoyed has been clamping down on this).

As soon as I saw headsets being used on Dirty Talk, I wondered why I hadn't seen them being used before - surely it can't be the cost? I just can't understand why they haven't been implemented by any other channels? I mean, am I missing something??

The only benefits I can see from using handsets are that they’re possibly more practical in the shower and are also good for the odd occasion when a girl decides to tuck the phone down her cleavage. Then of course, there was Megan, who had her own unique way of enticing us viewers - and if she returned to her bad ways, that might be enough to convince me otherwise! Smile

[Image: image-65ED_4F422AF6.jpg]

I wonder if she had it on vibrate?

But, I digress. I thought handsets might be better for 2-4-1's, but if both girls had headsets they could just have a conference call, leaving their hands to do....whatever they wanted!

Having headsets reduces your chances of being cut off because a girl accidentally presses the wrong button and would stop them from shaking the phone at the screen - especially during a call. It would also mean that if a microphone was left on, we'd only have to listen to the girl – no offence, guys!

For me, it's a no-brainer – headsets are definitely the way forward!
headsets would allow the ladies to be more active.
I've seen RLC use them,but not often.
No!!!

It's impossible to tell if they're on a call
(20-02-2012 22:47 )gazfc Wrote: [ -> ]No!!!

It's impossible to tell if they're on a call

True, but they could just shake their heads around instead like they do with the phones Big Grin
(20-02-2012 22:47 )gazfc Wrote: [ -> ]No!!!

It's impossible to tell if they're on a call

you would think that, but when you see it for yourself, it's actually quite obvious when they've got a caller on the line - even if they're just listening to the caller talk
surprised no ones pointed out it would leave their hands free............... to send messages or update their twitter or fb on their own mobiles....!!!!??? lol. also leave their hands free for more lovely 'hand bra' moments too......... not that im casting aspertions, like..... lol.
I wish I'd been using one last night.As whilst in the middle of a call to a babe I lost grip,it flew through the air bounced off a chair, skidded across the floor finishing up somewhere under my bed.They can be quite a handful.
it looks like the only way i'm going to convince everyone, is by digging out my old recordings of Dirty Talk. i'm surprised no-one seems to have seen it. it was 35p per minute, for crying out loud!

Jade-Victoria, Bonnie Lee, Tammy Oldham, Honey Scott, Sammie Dee, Kiera Jones, Flo..........any one of these could demonstrate the benefits and sway your decision. trust me! Wink
(21-02-2012 01:21 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote: [ -> ]I wish I'd been using one last night.As whilst in the middle of a call to a babe I lost grip,it flew through the air bounced off a chair, skidded across the floor finishing up somewhere under my bed.They can be quite a handful.

Didn't know you had a detachable member. laugh
Pages: 1 2 3
Reference URL's