(20-02-2012 18:20 )terence Wrote: [ -> ]sorry to be pedantic (again) but 'which babes arsehole would you rim' is in the singular. if it was plural it would say 'which babes arseholes would you rim'.
just sayin.
Actually, it should be 'which babe's aresole would you rim' since arsole is the property of the babe.
Babes is plural, babe's isn't
so that means i should have wrote 'arsehole's' instead of arseholes lol! what a lovely little grammar lesson! i might use this as an example the next time my mum tries to correct my poor grasp of the english language!
(19-02-2012 20:51 )Sm© Wrote: [ -> ] (19-02-2012 20:23 )terence Wrote: [ -> ]nobody's said dionne daniels yet? wtf!
The Dionne fans never venture out of the Elite forum 
I beg your pardon dear sir....some of us Dionne Daniels fans have a....er...well "delicate Palate"
....LOL,and it goes without saying...er..but I'll say it anyway,
My vote goes to Dionne Daniels
....(Analingus, a perfectly reasonable practice)....lol
(20-02-2012 19:37 )terence Wrote: [ -> ]so that means i should have wrote 'arsehole's' instead of arseholes lol! what a lovely little grammar lesson! i might use this as an example the next time my mum tries to correct my poor grasp of the english language!
Terence I'm shocked.
If your poor old mum hear's you using works like 'rim and arsehole' in the same sentence again, then it will be you who won't be able to sit down on yours.
Now I'm not an expert but doesn't it depend on where the apostrophe is placed ie "babe's arseole" for the singular and "babes' arseoles" for the plural? As cw omitted the apostrophe then I think it can be read either way although the omission of the s at the end of arseole, as terence said, probably clinches the issue in the favour of the singular. The issue is also complicated by cw's stylistic idiosyncrasy of using the word babes to refer to one woman (I'm assuming there is only one fernnybabes).
Anyway, back on topic, all my jabs are up to date and I own a full set of test tube brushes and a tin of scouring powder so I would be delighted to make the aquaintance any young lady's tradesman's entrance, although I must confess that Poigey Typist has always been a favourite of mine.
Tori Lee is a defo..an arse 2 die for...theres a few more too...but not enuff room to place them all !!! My choice of babes on my profile would all suffice...whoarrrrrr.....
(20-02-2012 19:37 )terence Wrote: [ -> ]so that means i should have wrote 'arsehole's' instead of arseholes lol! what a lovely little grammar lesson! i might use this as an example the next time my mum tries to correct my poor grasp of the english language!
No, sir, you are quite right with aresholes as plural, but singular would be arsehole. which babe's arsehole would you rim.
If only English at school as as much fun. Could have demonstrated using Miss Wragg (yes, a very real name). I hope she is married and it is changed now. I hear she married a Mr Tampon.
(20-02-2012 20:28 )Dan Volatile Wrote: [ -> ]As cw omitted the apostrophe then I think it can be read either way although the omission of the s at the end of arseole, as terence said, probably clinches the issue in the favour of the singular
I do hope CW is an English Master at a high aged girls school (16 - 18).
What about reciprocation ?
