This is not going to be popular, but, in the interests of truthful, constructive criticism re. Kandi's FV show:-
The not so good:-
She's on one of the poorest sets.
The outfit isn't in the same league as Officer Kandi (or College Girl, Stable Girl etc.).
Performance, so far (it's early days), seems tamer than satellite only shows – perhaps as a result of the poor set, which isn’t particularly conducive to good/interesting performance – where's a table when you need it?
The good:-
Kandi's on FV!
While the outfit isn't the best I've seen, it's none-too-shabby – Kandi in black, thigh-high, spike heel boots, and leather bra? Nice!
Overall, while it could be better, something actually worth watching on PBCH has to be welcomed, and it's infinitely preferable to the vast majority of the channel's output.
What can I say, I'm a discerning viewer
If you'll excuse me, I'll now duck, and run for cover...
Credit where it's due: Kandi AND Rachel both on FV tonight. Good work RLC. Now if only Rachel would be off the phone for a few minutes so I can judge her 'phone philth' skills
(29-08-2012 00:56 )Censorship :-( Wrote: [ -> ]What can I say, I'm a discerning viewer
So is everyone else
It is pretty amusing that your evident joy is still tempered by the need to have a bloody moan
(29-08-2012 08:51 )Doddle Wrote: [ -> ] (29-08-2012 00:56 )Censorship :-( Wrote: [ -> ]What can I say, I'm a discerning viewer
So is everyone else
It is pretty amusing that your evident joy is still tempered by the need to have a bloody moan
Just look at tonight - Kandi is on again, but not on FV, of course - better set, and it's immediately apparent, IMO at least, that her performance is better, too - why should we have to settle for 'second best', again... particularly when we get to see her so infrequently?
Kandi's' presence on FV, in a decent outfit, giving a decent performance, doesn't mean that I wouldn't be even happier with Kandi on FV, again, on a better set, and giving an even better performance – I don't see the contradiction?
I'm pretty sure that other Kandi fans wouldn't be unhappy with this, or can too much Kandi really be 'too much of a good thing'?
Just the opinion of one discerning viewer to another, you understand...
Ava AGAIN tonight ? Can someone please explain how Ava is apparently RLC's no.1 choice for their FV channel ? She is almost NEVER on a call. And always looks bored. Pathetic.
(31-08-2012 00:25 )The Robot Devil Wrote: [ -> ]Ava AGAIN tonight ? Can someone please explain how Ava is apparently RLC's no.1 choice for their FV channel ? She is almost NEVER on a call. And always looks bored. Pathetic.
But she was one of the only women to go nude last night, so I'm grateful for that!
I've just flicked on (after having a lovely little twitter chat with a wonderful young lady) and it's Ree Petra at the moment. Kandi would've been great, but I like Ree so she's fine to have on in the background. Fortunately it appears I've missed Ava, whilst apparently the other Candy is also working tonight.
Just when you thought it couldn’t get any worse, we get AB, then RP, and now, CS!
For fuck's sake, get Kandi on!
(30-08-2012 01:13 )Censorship :-( Wrote: [ -> ] (29-08-2012 08:51 )Doddle Wrote: [ -> ]It is pretty amusing that your evident joy is still tempered by the need to have a bloody moan
Just look at tonight - Kandi is on again, but not on FV, of course - better set, and it's immediately apparent, IMO at least, that her performance is better, too - why should we have to settle for 'second best', again... particularly when we get to see her so infrequently?
Kandi's' presence on FV, in a decent outfit, giving a decent performance, doesn't mean that I wouldn't be even happier with Kandi on FV, again, on a better set, and giving an even better performance – I don't see the contradiction?
I'm pretty sure that other Kandi fans wouldn't be unhappy with this, or can too much Kandi really be 'too much of a good thing'?
Just the opinion of one discerning viewer to another, you understand...
Any Kandi is better than no Kandi to me
But I know what you're getting at (for want of a better phrase)
