The UK Babe Channels Forum

Forget the rest, simply enjoy the best



http://www.megaupload.com/?d=31LD4HE9

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=EAQKOB65

[NB These are two separate videos as my Sky+ cut off during Mica's performance]

6th July - Highlights

Embedded Vid

Press the pink play button to view the vid.

DL Screen Caps



















Thanks to ImageChunk.com for Free adult image host
Download Link
http://www.megaporn.com/?d=7LCM3MS8

I must have gone to sleep, because I never saw her second nude show from the 6th. At 38:40, she clearly removes her hand, giving us a nice glimpse of her downstairs (Not anymore graphic than a Camilla or Karina show on Babestation), but the cameraman moves the camera

I think shots like those should be allowed, because they aren't explicit, but they give us a tiny bit of detail. What harm will something like that cause?

Awesome stuff from Mica, and I hope she returns soon!

Thanks in everyway!

(08-07-2010 17:21 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]I must have gone to sleep, because I never saw her second nude show from the 6th. At 38:40, she clearly removes her hand, giving us a nice glimpse of her downstairs (Not anymore graphic than a Camilla or Karina show on Babestation), but the cameraman moves the camera :(

I think shots like those should be allowed, because they aren't explicit, but they give us a tiny bit of detail. What harm will something like that cause?

Awesome stuff from Mica, and I hope she returns soon!

There are rules that must be respected.

[/quote]

There are rules that must be respected.
[/quote]

I know. Damn Offcom!

(09-07-2010 18:15 )khal6 Wrote: [ -> ]

(08-07-2010 17:21 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]I must have gone to sleep, because I never saw her second nude show from the 6th. At 38:40, she clearly removes her hand, giving us a nice glimpse of her downstairs (Not anymore graphic than a Camilla or Karina show on Babestation), but the cameraman moves the camera

I think shots like those should be allowed, because they aren't explicit, but they give us a tiny bit of detail. What harm will something like that cause?

Awesome stuff from Mica, and I hope she returns soon!

There are rules that must be respected.

Rules? Oh yes - Rule 2.3 "offensive material must be justified by context"

Let's see now...

The context is a TV Sex chat show. Bound to be some offensive naughty bits on screen in that context isn't there?

Naked girl + Sex chat show = nothing offensive on show at all?

Tis an odd world Ofcom occupy. Why, only 5 years ago there'd be close-ups of gals flashing their fannies with their legs wide open.

Look here http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=12628

But of course I'm forgetting Ofcom have a vendetta against nudity on TV if its not in a purely educational context. God forbid people might actually wank off to the sight of a pretty girl showing her equally pretty snatch on TV.

I might not mind so much but the law (the 'Rules' that Rule the land and Ofcom) doesn't actually instruct Ofcom to write a Code to allow anyone to try and justify the inclusion of any offensive material by context. The law actually commands Ofcom to ensure the public are adequately protected from the inclusion of such material full stop. So, if the sight of a pussy in a sex ed show isn't offensive and/or harmful, its very unlikely the sight of a pussy could be offensive and/or harmful on a sex chat show either.

There are indeed rules that must be obeyed - the law for example, logic too - Ofcom appear to obey neither.

A video from Tuesday 06 July 2010




http://www.megaupload.com/?d=WTTQ0IXS

Mica looking Super Cute in her Super Girl (how apt) panties.

The video begins with a very enticing request from Mica.

I find it curious that my prefered photo is wherhe only appears a pair of such beautifull eyes!god keep them safe.