(14-05-2012 17:50 )skully Wrote: [ -> ]I don't think she's done anything wrong here btw, it's her with a guy...b/g shoot, it's not false advertising or 'rip off', because nowhere has she said it would be hardcore, or explicit. You shouldn't expect hardcore from a non-hardcore model.
It's not the fact that it does not say "hardcore B/G", it's the fact it doesn't say "not explicit" if you get my meaning?
I think I understand where you're coming from, B/G does usually mean some level of explicitness, the description is too vague, so some people may be left feeling a little disappointed. Maybe it could have been worded differently to avoid any confusion.
(14-05-2012 21:05 )alexalex246 Wrote: [ -> ]Exactly. Here are some pics of the set off her twitter, suggestive much? 
She doesn't look good pressed up against a guy. The site is supposed to be a site where guys can download some pics and knock one off to her, shooting a set like that is one way to lose fans, it's not HC but it's not just Lilly by herself, she's pressed up against a non-average looking bloke, it just doesn't look right.
I know that Lilly rates the pics highly, but I think in this instance she has made a mistake, if I was a member I would feel as if I had been ripped off, I would have paid to see Lilly Roma, not Lilly Roma pressed up a guy.
I would hope in future that she doesn't try an 'experiment' like this again.
Are the people complaining really so insecure that they can't bear for one or two photoshoots with a guy? If you're a member of her site make sure to tweet her and comment on her blog that it's not something you like and if not, don't join. As has been mentioned, the sparsity of updates on the site should be more of an issue than what the updates actually are.
At the end of the day it's Lilly's website (it isn't associated with any channel so shouldn't be compared with ones that are), and it's up to her what content gets put onto it.
It's not anything to do with insecurity, at least for me (despite my comments, this was more for others who might be less secure), and I've been a member before and been less than impressed.
As has been said previously, when you sign up for a site like that, you expect to see Lilly looking gorgeous as she always does, and maybe every once in a while shoot with one of her girly pals as a treat for her members, what you don't expect is a guy holding her and groping her and all in a variety of suggestive positions.
I've seen some people speak to Lilly about the B/G sets on BabesFromTV webcams saying that they don't like them, with Lilly saying that she doesn't really care what they think.
Given these comments I hope that we do not see any guys at Latexotica unless they are the ones behind the camera.
(16-05-2012 16:28 )iloveMegan Wrote: [ -> ]Are the people complaining really so insecure that they can't bear for one or two photoshoots with a guy? If you're a member of her site make sure to tweet her and comment on her blog that it's not something you like and if not, don't join. As has been mentioned, the sparsity of updates on the site should be more of an issue than what the updates actually are.
At the end of the day it's Lilly's website (it isn't associated with any channel so shouldn't be compared with ones that are), and it's up to her what content gets put onto it.
I don't think anyone is insecure, its just that, I'm sure people would agree would prefer to see Lilly Roma being feeled up by a woman. Its up to Lilly Roma definitely, she can do what she want, but theres no harm in people having a preference
(16-05-2012 16:44 )LatexRyan Wrote: [ -> ]what you don't expect is a guy holding her and groping her and all in a variety of suggestive positions.
Why not?
(16-05-2012 16:44 )LatexRyan Wrote: [ -> ]I've seen some people speak to Lilly about the B/G sets on BabesFromTV webcams saying that they don't like them, with Lilly saying that she doesn't really care what they think.
It's a shame she has that attitude to her customers (or potential customers), but that probably just goes to show that this site is something of a vanity project for her where she'll continue to shoot whatever she likes. If you don't like it, all you can do is not join.
If you look at the pictures with the guy, he isn't exactly looking at the camera. I think you have to think outside the box. He isn't there to "grope" her or to be an active part of the shoot, he is there pretty much as a prop. Something to try and stimulate some imagination from the potential/actual customers in that "it could be me" type thing.
(16-05-2012 16:44 )LatexRyan Wrote: [ -> ]Given these comments I hope that we do not see any guys at Latexotica unless they are the ones behind the camera.
A sister site is being set up for this.
(16-05-2012 16:28 )iloveMegan Wrote: [ -> ]Are the people complaining really so insecure that they can't bear for one or two photoshoots with a guy? If you're a member of her site make sure to tweet her and comment on her blog that it's not something you like and if not, don't join. As has been mentioned, the sparsity of updates on the site should be more of an issue than what the updates actually are.
At the end of the day it's Lilly's website (it isn't associated with any channel so shouldn't be compared with ones that are), and it's up to her what content gets put onto it.
exactly its up to lilly what goes on her site, if you dont like it then either dont join or dont look at the pics that dont like