You guys say "valid customer complaints". Are they valid complaints though? Do you not think there are more important things in the world than a babe not appearing after 10pm?
In my opinion, the criticism of Sarah is unwarranted. There is a case for criticism of Babestation, but not the individual performers. Its the same for any channel.
I hope she chooses not to appear on nights again. Then I'd get to see her happy, and neither she nor I would have to read this ridiculous stuff that appears here.
Please Sarah, stay on daytime. I want her to be happy.
(17-09-2011 22:53 )Regenerated Wrote: [ -> ]You guys say "valid customer complaints". Are they valid complaints though? Do you not think there are more important things in the world than a babe not appearing after 10pm?
In my opinion, the criticism of Sarah is unwarranted. There is a case for criticism of Babestation, but not the individual performers. Its the same for any channel.
I hope she chooses not to appear on nights again. Then I'd get to see her happy, and neither she nor I would have to read this ridiculous stuff that appears here.
Please Sarah, stay on daytime. I want her to be happy.
When i called her on her first shift in the TEASE hour after 9pm and she wasnt being dirty, naughty,filthy and suggestive one bit on the fone dam right its a valid complaint....
Not fussed about that now mind all though she has done another Tease Hour show havent called her to see whats she is like now....
I do like Sarah mind sexy girl seems to have a bit of banter on BS days...
The banter that Sarah gives should be appreciated on both days and night shows if she does them. I think she's been suggestive on her tease hours and ok she may not be totally dirty or filthy, but thats just not her style on these tease hours. I wouldn't even call tease hours a proper night show.
Babestation are the gainers here. They'll continue to grab the profits if people are determined enough to call the shows, based on BS's scams. Blame BS in the other thread by all means, but this criticism is harsh on Sarah.
I do however appreciate all opinions, even if I may not agree with them. As a fan of Sarah's, I'm not bothered what time of day she appears as long as she's happy.
(19-09-2011 21:42 )Regenerated Wrote: [ -> ]Blame BS in the other thread by all means, but this criticism is harsh on Sarah.
I don't think so, Babestation have said that they don't force the girls to do tease hours if they don't want to, so Sarah has made the choice to do them. And has done so with no intention of talking dirty.
But there's no law that says the girls have to talk dirty is there ILM? If she has no intention of talking dirty, albeit suggestive, thats her choice. She has the right to decide what she wants to say on the phones. Just like people have the right to spend money on it. Would you concur with that?
You've backed me before on BS' policies. I've backed you too. Like I said I appreciate all opinions. We obviously disagree - I'm not trying to change people's minds.
Lets just leave it at that. I've given my two penny worth and so have you, so has Trickster, so has everyone else.
(20-09-2011 00:05 )Regenerated Wrote: [ -> ]But there's no law that says the girls have to talk dirty is there ILM?
There's no law, but what the girls usually say is something to the effect of "Call now and talk about whatever you want", with a clear implication that they expect dirty talk.
(20-09-2011 00:05 )Regenerated Wrote: [ -> ]If she has no intention of talking dirty, albeit suggestive, thats her choice. She has the right to decide what she wants to say on the phones.
"If she has no intention of talking dirty" then she shouldn't be on a night show. Yes she has the right to decide but since she has decided that dirty talk is not for her, she should stay on daytime where it won't be an issue.
(20-09-2011 00:21 )iloveMegan Wrote: [ -> ] (20-09-2011 00:05 )Regenerated Wrote: [ -> ]But there's no law that says the girls have to talk dirty is there ILM?
There's no law, but what the girls usually say is something to the effect of "Call now and talk about whatever you want", with a clear implication that they expect dirty talk.
(20-09-2011 00:05 )Regenerated Wrote: [ -> ]If she has no intention of talking dirty, albeit suggestive, thats her choice. She has the right to decide what she wants to say on the phones.
"If she has no intention of talking dirty" then she shouldn't be on a night show. Yes she has the right to decide but since she has decided that dirty talk is not for her, she should stay on daytime where it won't be an issue.
Exactly - "call now and talk about whatever you want" - there's no clear implication that they expect dirty talk in that statement. They don't have to expect anything.
Have I not said repeatedly that if she's more comfortable on days, then she should stick to what makes her happy?
How many more times do I have to stress that I think that move is best for her?
(20-09-2011 00:27 )Regenerated Wrote: [ -> ]Exactly - "call now and talk about whatever you want" - there's no clear implication that they expect dirty talk in that statement. They don't have to expect anything.
Considering a lot of callers think they can get dirty talk during the daytime, a girl would have to be naive in the extreme to not expect it after 9pm. And if what a caller wants to talk about is sex, the girl should oblige.
(20-09-2011 00:27 )Regenerated Wrote: [ -> ]Have I not said repeatedly that if she's more comfortable on days, then she should stick to what makes her happy?
Fair enough, but you have also said that criticism of her is unwarranted and it is purely Babestation who are to blame. As Sarah herself has decided to continue with the tease hour without fully committing to phone aspect she does deserve to be criticised.
(20-09-2011 01:04 )iloveMegan Wrote: [ -> ] (20-09-2011 00:27 )Regenerated Wrote: [ -> ]Exactly - "call now and talk about whatever you want" - there's no clear implication that they expect dirty talk in that statement. They don't have to expect anything.
Considering a lot of callers think they can get dirty talk during the daytime, a girl would have to be naive in the extreme to not expect it after 9pm. And if what a caller wants to talk about is sex, the girl should oblige.
(20-09-2011 00:27 )Regenerated Wrote: [ -> ]Have I not said repeatedly that if she's more comfortable on days, then she should stick to what makes her happy?
Fair enough, but you have also said that criticism of her is unwarranted and it is purely Babestation who are to blame. As Sarah herself has decided to continue with the tease hour without fully committing to phone aspect she does deserve to be criticised.
No. I don't agree that the "girl should oblige." The girl doesn't have to do anything.
Criticism of her or any girl for making a decision about what to discuss is unwarranted. Sarah has fully committed to the phone aspect. She has committed to say what she wants to say. It doesn't matter what you or anyone else "expects" them to say. She doesn't have to do what you or anyone else say.
You're obviously not letting this go, and thats absolutely right. So neither am I.
(20-09-2011 01:10 )Regenerated Wrote: [ -> ]Criticism of her or any girl for making a decision about what to discuss is unwarranted.
Not when she's working on an nightshow and won't talk dirty.
(20-09-2011 01:10 )Regenerated Wrote: [ -> ]Sarah has fully committed to the phone aspect. She has committed to say what she wants to say.
Not the night time phone aspect, and she shouldn't be on the tease hour if all she wants to say are daytime level things. On the first page of this thread there is a video of her on the bed with a graphic reading "She can finally get naughty", yet she has chosen not to. You may say that it is not up to her what gets put in that box but from working at BS all the time she has, and from the callers she must be getting she knows what is expected of her. If she's not willing to deliver, she shouldn't be on there and is complicit in a scam that you are only too happy to criticise Babestation for, but not the girl herself.