(22-10-2011 05:49 )rockey Wrote: [ -> ]if ofcom disappeared tomorrow the channels would stay exactley the same......
Not a chance. The channels would compete for viewers, or more importantly callers. The easiest way they'd be able to do this would be by being more explicit than their competitors. Anyone who didn't reveal more would lose out to those that were. It would change the face of the free to air/view channels completely. While the channels might prefer to get a fiver from viewers in return for more revealing/explicit shows, with no restrictions they'd be forced to compete on their free channels - it'd only take one channel (for example a new channel which would need to make its mark maybe) to show more skin in order for the others to follow suit. Those with more than one channel might be able to offer different types of services on different channels to appeal to different markets - nude models on one and lingerie clad glamour models on another - although I'm not convinced the latter would work if there were no restrictions whatsoever.
you're right skate, the girls who get their meat wallets out would get the most calls.
that's gotta be one of the more poetic, classy 2000th posts! 
The current tame output must be losing punters by the thousand....don't even SKY+ anymore after I go to bed....zzzzzzzzzz
(21-10-2011 18:01 )StanTheMan Wrote: [ -> ]I'm sorry, RESPONSIBLE ADULT, I'm as confused as ever and really don't understand what it is you're asking.
I thought you were simply asking us to imagine a world without Ofcom and a more liberal and broad-minded organisation in their place. If this were to happen the channels would simply revert to how they were before Ofcom clamped down. I don't see how your proposed scenario get's any more complex than that.
Stan, I am not asking any question, for anything, of anyone. Any possible scenario that I have suggested. I have gone on to give my own view of what I think the outcome would be regarding the channels As far as the girls are concerned no one could possibly predict what they would do. How could one? All my simple original post 'the part concerning the girls' said, was that it would be the interesting finding out. What was written as a throw-away piece is turning into somewhat of an epic.
(22-10-2011 13:54 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote: [ -> ]What was written as a throw-away piece is turning into somewhat of an epic.
That's because you've not made yourself clear. People are giving answers to questions you've not asked and, seemingly, failing to answer the question you have asked.
You can't argue that your very first (hypothetical) question in your OP was the what would happen to the babeshows if Ofcom disappeared and a more "liberal and broad-minded organisation" were put in their place (your words, not mine). So I'll say again, they'd revert back to how they were before Ofcom clamped down. Now if that's not what you were asking, then you and me are speaking a different language.
(22-10-2011 05:49 )rockey Wrote: [ -> ]......anybody see last nights rlc? nudity with a few flashes......
What sort of flashes? Are we talking gash here, and are we talking 'flashes' or slips? It's important that these things are defined fully, in order to appreciate your point.
the only problem with more explicit shows is for all they show more they tend to get less calls. but more viewers...
to be honest i dont think i would watch a full on HC show. coz porn bores me. but i would tune in if the girls were allowed to do fully naked without restriction 18 rated shows... pretty much similar to the kind of show you would find in stringfellows... slightly more explicite than on tvxPPV chat.
for instance i find that even my fav girls on SSTV bore me after 20 mins but i found myself watching 40 mins of babe station germany the other night. the girls were naked camillaizing there cushions... when they accidentally showed there undercarriage the cam op just let it go rather than rush zooming to there face. which is actually way less offensive to me... i could have watched another hour but there language is just to brutal.
when they pull away that quick it makes you want to upchuck. it sends a message that, this was naughty and you shouldn't have seen it...literally making a big deal out of nothing... but in the eu zone things are much more laid back.
(22-10-2011 15:01 )StanTheMan Wrote: [ -> ] (22-10-2011 13:54 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote: [ -> ]What was written as a throw-away piece is turning into somewhat of an epic.
That's because you've not made yourself clear. People are giving answers to questions you've not asked and, seemingly, failing to answer the question you have asked.
You can't argue that your very first (hypothetical) question in your OP was the what would happen to the babeshows if Ofcom disappeared and a more "liberal and broad-minded organisation" were put in their place (your words, not mine). So I'll say again, they'd revert back to how they were before Ofcom clamped down. Now if that's not what you were asking, then you and me are speaking a different language.
(22-10-2011 05:49 )rockey Wrote: [ -> ]......anybody see last nights rlc? nudity with a few flashes......
What sort of flashes? Are we talking gash here, and are we talking 'flashes' or slips? It's important that these things are defined fully, in order to appreciate your point.
For fucks sake Stan I've not asked any fucking questions What the fuck are you smoking.
(22-10-2011 16:51 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote: [ -> ]For fucks sake Stan I've not asked any fucking questions What the fuck are you smoking.
Maybe you should have rephrased your OP then.
(20-10-2011 23:34 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote: [ -> ]And who would be the first channel to get back into the old routine?
(21-10-2011 06:59 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]To be perfectly honest we've never really had a golden age, more just fleeting moments which have been all too brief with some of the channels taking it a wee bit further, we've had Babestar TV in 2006 for example which for all it's full frontal, it was still very much softcore compared to what the rest of Europe were showing, it was based more on Innuendo's than anything, I'd dearly love to see a new age as the golden age as far as I'm concerned never happened and is really just a myth similar to when people talk about the good old days. Bring on a new dawn instead of harking back to the past which their were no glory.
You're right matey, stop looking in the past, and look to the future, i think we can all agree the last 2-3yrs have been the best yet with more 241s and more interaction and so on. The fact still remains until Ofcom F**K off and the laws are relaxed as they used to be, only then can we start to enjoy our babe channels as they were intended.
I was reading in one of the posts how Ofcom can think a mans penis and testicles are perceived not to be offence yet a woman's Vagina is deemed to be Offensive mmmh work that one out?? The other night there was a couple on sexsextra doing naked Yoga, there you go, thats something we all can try in our living rooms
Anyway back to my point, there was the mans penis in full view flopping around as you do, and the woman's vagina had been faded out? Maybe all the guys at Ofcom are GAY and can't get enough of seeing men naked
I'm just trying to figure how they've come up with this conclusion?
To conclude as scottishbloke has mentioned we all need to look to the future, and let all of us who love our babe channels hope 2012 will be Ofcom free YAY
I wonder if secretely Ofcom are just jealous because it's only babe channels on the 900+ platform, maybe just to even the score they should have a bloke channel for the gays and women which obviously this is what the Ofcom panel are made up of
, just a thought, I obviously wouldn't be watching it, I only like women