(07-03-2012 01:27 )eccles Wrote: [ -> ]"Subject to ... the ability to block them" means people who dont want adult channels can lock them all out in one go. We already have that. And people can keep them but PIN protect adult channels.
The fact that Freeview equipments can't do this "in one go" and a tiny proportion of them have no parental control at all was one of Ofcom's main reasons for wanting to block the babe channels from Freeview. If the ultra-tame current content gets their knickers in a twist, what chance for anything stronger?
Yeah, odd on that. Ofcom went against their own recommendation and allowed something they said they were categorically against. Never quite understood why.
whats going to happen after the closing date then?
whats the point filling out the form if nothing substantial is going to happen after?
explain does that mean we will not be able to get any of the channels
dibs, it's only the petition that's closing, not the channels. The channels will be unaffected... unfortunately.
So basically the birds are never gonny show their fannys again like the old days. At least the net aint regulated!
what i dont get is who complains? there cant be many guys around who find the female genitalia offensive, nor many women, and surely in these days of liberty shows should be free to broadcast as they see fit, if people find it offensive they aren't forced to watch it! its f**kin ridiculous!
(24-11-2012 21:27 )JPLtiger Wrote: [ -> ]what i dont get is who complains? there cant be many guys around who find the female genitalia offensive, nor many women, and surely in these days of liberty shows should be free to broadcast as they see fit, if people find it offensive they aren't forced to watch it! its f**kin ridiculous!
I think it was the babe channels reporting each other. Now the girls can't even touch each other without being told off by the producers. I wish I had a time machine go back to the good old days. I'm into the less is more thing but now we get nothing