The UK Babe Channels Forum - WWE PPV Prediction Thread

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113

(18-06-2018 21:22 )Doddle Wrote: [ -> ]
(18-06-2018 20:57 )ToonLink64 Wrote: [ -> ]To be fair Ronda Rousey won the women's title match by DQ, then Alexa cashed in, so the people who predicted Ronda should get an extra 3 points, right?
No.

But nice try

Rammy didn't get any points for not predicting the correct casher-in either. I think jumbo jim got points for hedging that there might be a cash-in, since he had predicted Alexa.

I'm not into offering "1 point for being close". I'm not Ken Bruce, tha knows

But thanks for the feedback

I was only joking, but that was the correct result, though.

Of course Rammy didn't get any points for the cash in, if it was by a totally different person.

I've slept on this, and predictably I'm sticking to my guns. The cash-in was the final result, not the interference which led directly to the cash-in.

It's not an opinion though, it's a fact. The cash in happened after the bell rang/disqualification. It didn't turn into a triple threat like what happened at WM31 with Rollins, Reigns & Lesnar.
These are the official results taken from WWE.com for you to see:

Very nice.

I'm not changing my opinion.

Even though it's not a case of opinion when it's a fact.

Event A led directly, solely & instantly to Event B - that is a fact.

I'm calling Event B the end and not Event A - opinion based entirely on that fact.

I'm not saying it didn't. It was pretty much 2 seperate matches back to back. If there was no such thing as a cash in & Alexa hit Ronda with a just an ordinary weapon, it would've been a DQ - that's why the bell rang to end the much, then rang again for the cash in match.

OK, well I tend to use Wrestling Observer for my news than WWE, and here's how I read it:

Quote:NIA JAX VS. RONDA ROUSEY FOR RAW WOMEN'S TITLE

This ended up beign a great deal. Alexa Bliss interfered and destroyed Rousey and Jax with the briefcase and then hit Jax a few more times with the briefcase and hit twisted Bliss to become champion. Rousey had Jax in the armbar when Bliss broke it up. Jax vs. Rousey was real good. Rousey has an intensity and a face that connects really well. It was all planned out and such but Rousey really is a natural at this. Her selling was far better than one would expect, her comebacks looked good. The match itself was exciting and the whole scenario with the title change was great. This built up a Rousey vs. Bliss match at some point going forward.

I read that as one result, not two.

I wish I could remember to do this more often.

I don't know if I'm good at it or if Vince is just quite predictable. Huh

Oh man, I feel like Bret Hart getting screwed in Montreal!

I suppose you can read the Wrestling Observer. I mean why take the word from the official company who actually booked the match and posted the results, eh?