(13-07-2011 14:00 )admiral decker Wrote: [ -> ]If it pushes the boundaries in the current climate the channel won't last very long.
I don't wish to sound flippant, but that would be just fine by me. Babestar didn't last long, but boy what a fucking ride!!!
(13-07-2011 17:48 )StanTheMan Wrote: [ -> ]I don't wish to sound flippant, but that would be just fine by me. Babestar didn't last long, but boy what a fucking ride!!!
Yes but this may just be a quick wank or two for us but it's the livelihoods of both the girls and the production staff. It is also costly for the owners/promoters if the channel fails - I really would welcome more explicit shows but not if the contributors are risking and lose such a lot - it's unfair to expect it.
(13-07-2011 22:48 )Renfrew169 Wrote: [ -> ]Yes but this may just be a quick wank or two for us but it's the livelihoods of both the girls and the production staff. It is also costly for the owners/promoters if the channel fails - I really would welcome more explicit shows but not if the contributors are risking and lose such a lot - it's unfair to expect it.
best not to expect too much ,that way no one will be to upset!(says in ernest lol)
(13-07-2011 22:48 )Renfrew169 Wrote: [ -> ] (13-07-2011 17:48 )StanTheMan Wrote: [ -> ]I don't wish to sound flippant, but that would be just fine by me. Babestar didn't last long, but boy what a fucking ride!!!
Yes but this may just be a quick wank or two for us but it's the livelihoods of both the girls and the production staff. It is also costly for the owners/promoters if the channel fails - I really would welcome more explicit shows but not if the contributors are risking and lose such a lot - it's unfair to expect it.
forgive me for sounding harsh here, but why should any of that matter to me? I'm in no way repsonsible for these peoples' livelihoods.
Any news on a start date for this channel we're half way through July now
The channel's output will be sensible, in accordance with the relevant code. Anyone who suggests otherwise is deluding themselves, as Ofcom's regulation of these channels is tighter than ever nowadays.
From my point of view it'd be great to see a few new faces!
(06-07-2011 13:30 )Wazo Wrote: [ -> ]Looks like a new babe channel will soon begin testing off the epg as the 54210 label on 12.643 H 27.5 2/3 has info for a show called FlirtXchange Flirt Chat Live no picture yet just a epg description. Am guessing this will be the channel from xxXpanded TV.
Stillroom Rock Wrote:Any news on a start date for this channel we're half way through July now
I think it's imminent. They're now displaying a proper test card on the test broadcast (info quoted above) rather than Sky's default "There is a technical problem with this channel. Please try later"
(14-07-2011 13:50 )StanTheMan Wrote: [ -> ]I think it's imminent. They're now displaying a proper test card on the test broadcast (info quoted above) rather than Sky's default "There is a technical problem with this channel. Please try later"
is it on one of the former babe channels?
(14-07-2011 01:59 )StanTheMan Wrote: [ -> ]forgive me for sounding harsh here, but why should any of that matter to me? I'm in no way repsonsible for these peoples' livelihoods.
Hmm!! You may not feel responsible but why should they bother to fulfill what you (or I for that matter ) would like if we don't give a stuff for their situation? If by flouting the rules, however asinine we might think they are, they shorten their own career or lose all their money, then more fool them. No TV channels at all, which is the inevitable result of a series of "wild rides", doesn't seem to me to be a good result.