(29-06-2011 22:45 )Renfrew169 Wrote: [ -> ]Guys - what are you doing? Surely we all have said in the past that highlighting these instances only serves to aggravate the situation - it can't hurt Sport now but I don't think it is fair to the girls or the channels to do Ofcoms work for them.
I'm sorry if this seems like criticism and I know the info is already there but.......
I'm the last person to ruin things by mentioning what goes on on these channels, which is why I kept everything to myself regarding Sport, and every other channel, including Babestation. The only reason I'm mentioning this now is because, like you said, the evidence has already been posted and mentioned by other people in the Babestation section, so my mentioning certain things again can not be to blame if Ofcom decides to crack down on them. Ofcom could easily go to the Babestation section and find everybody else's revealing comments and vid and cap posts, and use that against them, so it's not an issue for me to mention something. It's beyond our control unfortunately, because while we were all mostly hush hush about Sport, it didn't matter as they are no longer, and it's not like it matters much anymore, seeing how you can't tell people to stop posting videos, because then there would be nothing left of this forum, other than people speaking in code. I think it's best to be secretive when noticing something possibly rule breaking, which I've always been, but when it doesn't matter, and when the other channels are not showing the same type of content, it's worth mentioning I think.
Sorry I wasn't getting at anyone in particular and I fully accept the points made above but I just felt that these items are " buried " in threads and it was counter productive to shine a light on them again.
But fairy snuff if you feel it's ok.
(29-06-2011 23:06 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ] (29-06-2011 22:45 )Renfrew169 Wrote: [ -> ]Guys - what are you doing? Surely we all have said in the past that highlighting these instances only serves to aggravate the situation - it can't hurt Sport now but I don't think it is fair to the girls or the channels to do Ofcoms work for them.
I'm sorry if this seems like criticism and I know the info is already there but.......
I'm the last person to ruin things by mentioning what goes on on these channels, which is why I kept everything to myself regarding Sport, and every other channel, including Babestation. The only reason I'm mentioning this now is because, like you said, the evidence has already been posted and mentioned by other people in the Babestation section, so my mentioning certain things again can not be to blame if Ofcom decides to crack down on them. Ofcom could easily go to the Babestation section and find everybody else's revealing comments and vid and cap posts, and use that against them, so it's not an issue for me to mention something. It's beyond our control unfortunately, because while we were all mostly hush hush about Sport, it didn't matter as they are no longer, and it's not like it matters much anymore, seeing how you can't tell people to stop posting videos, because then there would be nothing left of this forum, other than people speaking in code. I think it's best to be secretive when noticing something possibly rule breaking, which I've always been, but when it doesn't matter, and when the other channels are not showing the same type of content, it's worth mentioning I think.
Look at us. Fear of posting information, speaking in code?
This is a 21st century moderrn western democracy and we have to behave as if we're living in some 3rd world repressive dictatorship.
All this secretiveness, all this furtiveness and all because a woman showed a bit of fanny on an adult tv channel!
You really couldn't make it up, could you.
Hurrah for Ofcon.
I think all the Babe Channels should have pin numbers, but still be free to air. I dont know if they can do this, but if they could, at least then the channels can get back to there once former glorys. At the moment, most of the channels are very dull indeed.
as much as i laugh at the ofcom hate mob on here, its stuff like this which validities there rants.
Just randomly deciding to throw a 90 grand fine out there is pathetic and ofcom seriously needs looking at and revising especially in this time of cuts in goverment
(29-06-2011 22:45 )Renfrew169 Wrote: [ -> ]Guys - what are you doing? Surely we all have said in the past that highlighting these instances only serves to aggravate the situation - it can't hurt Sport now but I don't think it is fair to the girls or the channels to do Ofcoms work for them.
I'm sorry if this seems like criticism and I know the info is already there but.......
You really have no reason for concern, Renfrew... not anymore. The channels are beyond repair and I don't think it matters one iota what info we provide Ofcom with now.
(29-06-2011 22:32 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ] (29-06-2011 21:27 )StanTheMan Wrote: [ -> ]Granted, the pussy oops from this clip is very nice, but if Cellcast have special licence to show harder material, why does the cameraman panic so much at 1:35 when he notices how much she's showing?
I said to ignore this one, because she seemed to be doing this when the cameraman was away. Check out the other vids of the women I mentioned to see examples. Karina and Jada did this position almost every night, without the cameraman flinching, though it was the on the back position, legs open. Others have and still do as well, though they've tamed things in the past week, probably because they know Ofcom is on to them.
Well I've just been through about the last 10 pages of Jada's vid thread and didn't find any examples of on-the-back pussy shots??? Are you winding me up, mrmann?
(30-06-2011 09:16 )chrislatimer Wrote: [ -> ]as much as i laugh at the ofcom hate mob on here, its stuff like this which validities there rants.
Just randomly deciding to throw a 90 grand fine out there is pathetic and ofcom seriously needs looking at and revising especially in this time of cuts in goverment
Ofcon are making a very good job of justyfying their stance on the adult TV channels.
The government seem to be taken in by it.
(01-07-2011 14:00 )StanTheMan Wrote: [ -> ] (29-06-2011 22:32 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ] (29-06-2011 21:27 )StanTheMan Wrote: [ -> ]Granted, the pussy oops from this clip is very nice, but if Cellcast have special licence to show harder material, why does the cameraman panic so much at 1:35 when he notices how much she's showing?
I said to ignore this one, because she seemed to be doing this when the cameraman was away. Check out the other vids of the women I mentioned to see examples. Karina and Jada did this position almost every night, without the cameraman flinching, though it was the on the back position, legs open. Others have and still do as well, though they've tamed things in the past week, probably because they know Ofcom is on to them.
Well I've just been through about the last 10 pages of Jada's vid thread and didn't find any examples of on-the-back pussy shots??? Are you winding me up, mrmann?
Here's the last video in her thread :
http://www.megaporn.com/?d=Y3H2LQ2R
MANY of her other videos have this position in it, and there just aren't many caps of it, which is why you haven't noticed it. Also, there appears to have been a deletion of some of her videos from when I last checked a while back. They weren't graphic, but they were certainly close to full frontal, as were many of the other vids from some of the women I mentioned, and rarely ever have I seen those positions on the other channels.
I guess you all have heard the news about Red Light not allowing any new videos to be posted here, at least not for a long while. It's a sad sign of the times.
The news about RLC and no posting videos was the point of my earlier post - these guys at Ofcom have got the bit between their teeth and I don't think we should help them destroy any more channels!
I know it seems like we are being censored but if we apply it to ourselves surely it's discretion......... valour and all that.
I don't know what the future holds but I would hate to think that the pursuit of perceived freedom on the forum contributed to the evidence used by Ofcom.