(30-01-2011 15:04 )Amanda J Wrote: [ -> ]OFCOM in a nutshell! Its ridiculous is'nt it, you can switch mtv on and its deemed perfectly acceptable for girls to gyrate in a sexual manner in their lingerie......yet because the 900 channels are classed as adult entertainment we must be moderately covered during the daytime.....all the channels should have a pin so that we can still act sexual during the daytime, thats my personal view.
That about MTV is soooo true, and that has more of a bad influence. Fortunately clothes are disappearing again Slowly :-)
I'm sure if the babe channels were willing to fight this hypocrisy that is Ofcom, they would probably win but with the amount of money this would cost and hassle and the fact the day channels are still making the income the bottom line is they simply can't be arsed. Lady GaGa gyrating in next to nothing seems perfectly acceptable as so does a naked chef on This Morning too but Ofcom know that mainstream channels such as ITV and MTV won't be so easy to take on as the babe channels are, number of factors involved here, SKY for a start do not own or have any sort of control over the Adult Channels so they are in a word sitting ducks with no form of protection and can be revoked without warning, this has to change but first the Adult Channels all have to seek protection even it means paying SKY to do so on this issue and only then will Ofcom find it equally as difficult to mess around with them too knowing the huge organisation they would have to deal with.
(24-03-2011 02:02 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]I'm sure if the babe channels were willing to fight this hypocrisy that is Ofcom, they would probably win but with the amount of money this would cost and hassle and the fact the day channels are still making the income the bottom line is they simply can't be arsed. Lady GaGa gyrating in next to nothing seems perfectly acceptable as so does a naked chef on This Morning too but Ofcom know that mainstream channels such as ITV and MTV won't be so easy to take on as the babe channels are, number of factors involved here, SKY for a start do not own or have any sort of control over the Adult Channels so they are in a word sitting ducks with no form of protection and can be revoked without warning, this has to change but first the Adult Channels all have to seek protection even it means paying SKY to do so on this issue and only then will Ofcom find it equally as difficult to mess around with them too knowing the huge organisation they would have to deal with.
Bang on, Top Layers cost Top dollar. Here is my idea. All clothes should be sponsored by like ann summers etc that way putting up something up in the top corner of the screen saying "Matching Bra thong combo @ Annsummers.com that way its fashion and gets in a loophole. cant get away with sexual gestures though ... but doing a fitness workout, Well ........ LOOPHOLE
the clothes are most defo getting shorter, lower and tighter.
(27-03-2011 20:56 )bigguy01 Wrote: [ -> ]the clothes are most defo getting shorter, lower and tighter.
Feck yea Whale Tail back on 966/storm love it, what a cheap turn on lol
the girls on daytime are now wearing tops with really short hotpants,really nice short dresses and office attire...the only thing is they can't show anything.
I can understand the clothes on the nightshows being short and more flesh revealing on the night shows but not really on the dayshows, no doubt ofcom will have something to say about the clothes getting smaller and more tighter on the dayshows.
Hey All,
I'll admit it, I love seeing braless models on the shows.
However, I don't understand why there is very little braless-themed stuff on the shows. I consider it to be a huge tease, perhaps more than the type of clothing a model is wearing. I mean, there seems to be plenty of "accidental" slips and huge amounts of cleavage on offer - stuff that might be seen as way more "daring" and "revealing". It's like there is an aversion to bralessness. Things like spandex, tight tops and swimsuits were just made to be worn braless; why are so few girls not ditching their bra's?
So, in the interests of restoring the balance, and atrracting some support from others, please add comments to this thread, and perhaps we can get the models/producers to listen and take note.
What do other's think?????
(15-07-2011 09:03 )wickednip Wrote: [ -> ]why are so few girls not ditching their bra's?
Do you mean "why are so few girls ditching their bras?" ?
For the answer, rearrange these five letters:
C O F M O
(15-07-2011 09:03 )wickednip Wrote: [ -> ]Hey All,
I'll admit it, I love seeing braless models on the shows.
However, I don't understand why there is very little braless-themed stuff on the shows. I consider it to be a huge tease, perhaps more than the type of clothing a model is wearing. I mean, there seems to be plenty of "accidental" slips and huge amounts of cleavage on offer - stuff that might be seen as way more "daring" and "revealing". It's like there is an aversion to bralessness. Things like spandex, tight tops and swimsuits were just made to be worn braless; why are so few girls not ditching their bra's?
So, in the interests of restoring the balance, and atrracting some support from others, please add comments to this thread, and perhaps we can get the models/producers to listen and take note.
What do other's think?????
I don't think you've been reading any of the other threads on here lol ....daytime shows are told to show less now not more, even the vocals are little more than a slightly flirty chit chat.
I do actually understand them clamping down on what the girls wear but have less empathy with the conversations being cut as well.
I would suggest using web show Glamour Stars Live where you can see a lot of these girls and be specific about what you desire etc.