The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: How has Ofcom's 'tightening up' of the babeshows affected your viewing of them?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
(01-01-2011 13:47 )phil33 Wrote: [ -> ]1. isn't Sky Arts part of a package and not FTA.

It's in the Style and Culture pack as well as being available to all 6 mix customers. So still widely available.
(01-01-2011 20:21 )burnt toast Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-01-2011 13:47 )phil33 Wrote: [ -> ]1. isn't Sky Arts part of a package and not FTA.

It's in the Style and Culture pack as well as being available to all 6 mix customers. So still widely available.

Well I subscribed to the cheapest pack available about 8 years ago, and Sky Arts was (and still is) available to me. So as you say, burnt toast, widely available.
They have realy fucked up my hunting for Nipslips Sad
(01-01-2011 23:13 )Firebird Wrote: [ -> ]They have realy fucked up my hunting for Nipslips Sad

Yup! The words Rare and Rocking Horse Shit spring to mind now.
(01-01-2011 13:47 )phil33 Wrote: [ -> ]Two questions/points and apologies for being pedantic but:

1. isn't Sky Arts part of a package and not FTA.

2. I didn't think Sexcetera showed female genitalia - I've only very briefly flicked in to watch and when I have any sign of labia have been blurred. IIRC Ofcom found against them a while ago saying a depiction of labia was insufficiently justified by context and so the blurring.

OK, loose terminology, Sky Arts isnt FTA, but it does not have mandatory access control either - cough up £1 a month and there is nothing to stop the family watching it.

And yes, Sexcetera DOES show male and female genitals. Its not really my thing, but I have looked at a few episodes over December, when the babeshows have lagged. They vary. Some show clunge in almost every scene, with hanging labia, others come from an era when different rules applied, have fewer shots focussed on the front botty area and pixelate the most obvious ones - but even those have some slit visible.
i didn't notice any difference on the channels, what happened, on night shows i mean becaiuse i don't watch the day shows
(07-01-2011 14:58 )rusty legrand Wrote: [ -> ]i didn't notice any difference on the channels, what happened, on night shows i mean becaiuse i don't watch the day shows

night time shows have never really done it for me coz they cant really go for it can they lol
but the day shows use to be fun n flirty,but even some of the ladies are starting to look un impressed now aswel ?

wish tey could wear other stuff from bikini`s and lingerie,nice dresses and elent evening wear is sexier,if they dont wear anything else Big Grin
(07-01-2011 15:22 )daytimeSLIPS Wrote: [ -> ]wish tey could wear other stuff from bikini`s and lingerie,nice dresses and elent evening wear is sexier,if they dont wear anything else Big Grin

I think Babestation's dayshow, 'Bikini Girls' should be renamed 'Fully-clothed Girls'
(08-01-2011 00:17 )StanTheMan Wrote: [ -> ]I think Babestation's dayshow, 'Bikini Girls' should be renamed 'Fully-clothed Girls'

Even the girls are aware of how stupid that name is Rolleyes
I feel with the new rules there is now a clear distinction between what is a daytime show and what is a night time show. What I liked about the old Party People and Lads Lounge shows(pre 2008) was that they were a bit cheeky but without crossing the line between what was a day and a night time shows.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Reference URL's