I have thought about this for a while and wanted to throw it out for debate. Why doesn't Cellcast bring out a porn mag featuring all of the presenters on it's books. The ones who don't like showing their minge can do fluff/see through shots. The middle of the road ones can do open leg shots and the more experienced babes can go the whole hog and do finger/dildo shots. It would sell by the bucket load and surely introduce a new stream of custom to their channels.
Anyone got any thoughts on this???????????
I don't think anybody's going to want to waste their time publishing a porn magazine in the internet age. I can't understand why those things are still on shelves.
That is actually a very good idea. Maybe they could have two versions like a nuts/zoo style and a 'porn' mag.
The only problem though is knowing Cellcast they will re-use old pictures used on their website so it might not be a good idea if people had subscriptions to them. Maybe a odd 'exclusive' shoot?
i am more for the internet printing a magazine is a waste of paper ok starting to sound like a eco warrior
I take your point gazwim but we're restricted to only seeing pictures from sites that have an inflated subscription fee. I was selfishly thinking of the exposure of more babes flesh than the medium of the interweb and it's future uses to convey porn to us mere mortals.
Just an thought to provoke debate...nothing more.
the internet would kill it in a few months as every magazine that is sold in shops you can get scans of it on many sites.
Nice idea,but I can't see Cellcast going for it,after they spent so much setting up websites......
In the consultation that the “Babeshow” trade body had with OFCOM last year, one of the main points that was brought up was that the “Babeshows” should be allowed to continue unrestricted because many of their viewers are housebound and therefore unable to go out and purchase pornography.
They also stated that many of the viewers are “disabled” and unable to reach the top shelf to buy the standard Porn Mags....
So they do care about their viewers after all!!!
vostok 1 Wrote:In the consultation that the “Babeshow” trade body had with OFCOM last year, one of the main points that was brought up was that the “Babeshows” should be allowed to continue unrestricted because many of their viewers are housebound and therefore unable to go out and purchase pornography.
They also stated that many of the viewers are “disabled” and unable to reach the top shelf to buy the standard Porn Mags....
So they do care about their viewers after all!!!
is that for real
Can you imagine how much cellcast etc would charge for these magazines?