The UK Babe Channels Forum

Of that % how many have posted though?

(09-08-2011 10:54 )gazfc Wrote: [ -> ]Of that % how many have posted though?

At the present time, the first 1476 pages (30 members per page) of the members list all show 0 posts. Out of 1769 pages, that is 83.4% of members have never posted (including banned ones and those that have left). Since spambot/spammers will have had their posts deleted, their post count will be zero as well.
You have to get to page 1563 to see those that have made 2 posts or more.

To summarize
Only 16.6% have posted once or more
Only 11.6% have posted twice or more.
Only 5.2% have posted 10 or more times
Only 1.4% have posted 100 or more times
Only 0.3% have posted 1000 or more times

Next question: how many of those who have never posted/ posted only a handful of times have popped up out of the woodwork to enter the Fantasy Football competition?

(09-08-2011 11:43 )TheWatcher Wrote: [ -> ]Only 0.3% have posted 1000 or more times

Bloody hell. That confirms it. I am a sad middle aged loner with nothing better to do. Weeps.

Ha, so I'm in the top 1.4%! Nice

(09-08-2011 18:57 )Captain Vimes Wrote: [ -> ]Bloody hell. That confirms it. I am a sad middle aged loner with nothing better to do. Weeps.

you needed confirmation?

well everyone is always telling me i am "special" and the fact i'm in the top 0.3% proves it

Some more info gathered from the members list.
Of the new members (92) that have joined in the last 24 hours, 37% of them (34) have been spambots and have been banned.
The number might actually be higher than this since many have not yet posted and been identified as spambots.

Does that include the two previous members who have bans reaching double figures and who both reappeared yesterday? Or were they before you started calculating? Coincidentally, both had "lee" in their original user names.

(11-08-2011 10:41 )eagle_si Wrote: [ -> ]Does that include the two previous members who have bans reaching double figures and who both reappeared yesterday? Or were they before you started calculating? Coincidentally, both had "lee" in their original user names.

Just checked again, the banned number did include those, but he was just as bad as a spambot anyway.