The UK Babe Channels Forum

Gents are there any caps/vids of this???

(05-09-2010 23:40 )kru92 Wrote: [ -> ]Gents are there any caps/vids of this???

yep loads here

http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=24051

(30-08-2010 18:57 )vila Wrote: [ -> ]

(30-08-2010 18:19 )Webbiola Wrote: [ -> ]Have we now decided that despite the fact that this is the sex industry with semi or fully naked girls talking filth, simulating sex acts and orgasms with we as viewers and callers well.........wanking that this is, despite all this, an art form?

Yes. After all, the purpose of all art forms is to stimulate emotion and imagination.

yer rite. art is supposed to stimulate emotions and imagination a higher function in the human brain. but this is not art because it stimulates arousal and corupt thought a lower base function in the brain.

that is a major difference between art and pornography.
no disrespect to the girls but it is laughable that some call it art... sorry thats just an excuse to justify to themselves the fact there talking dirty to wankers.

it is what it is.

(06-09-2010 05:18 )HEX!T Wrote: [ -> ]it is what it is.

Quite correct.
What it is is entertainment and entertainment is art. QED.

sorry cant agree m8. its nice that you think it is but art is subjective and the way its described here it just isnt.
you could argue till the cows come home but there is s specifyed definition of art and you said it. but it doesnt mean these shows qualify. artistic maybe, but not art.

As a big fan of Rachel and Becky wherever they appear, I couldn't miss their first nightshow special on Elite. And it was so amazing I'm driven (finally ) to post here to say thanks!

It's no surprise to see what a fantastic reception they got, they were so natural and what a perfect combination.

Can't wait for their return.

(06-09-2010 06:33 )HEX!T Wrote: [ -> ]sorry cant agree m8. its nice that you think it is but art is subjective and the way its described here it just isnt.
you could argue till the cows come home but there is s specifyed definition of art and you said it. but it doesnt mean these shows qualify. artistic maybe, but not art.

"art is subjective" but "there is s specifyed definition of art" and the shows are "artistic", "but not art"?????

I don't think this is worth any further comment.

(06-09-2010 17:20 )vila Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-09-2010 06:33 )HEX!T Wrote: [ -> ]sorry cant agree m8. its nice that you think it is but art is subjective and the way its described here it just isnt.
you could argue till the cows come home but there is s specifyed definition of art and you said it. but it doesnt mean these shows qualify. artistic maybe, but not art.

"art is subjective" but "there is s specifyed definition of art" and the shows are "artistic", "but not art"?????

I don't think this is worth any further comment.

Nice to see intellectual argument and counter argument for a change. What a great forum this is!

They are on again now, wonder if they'll drop any hints about a post 9 pm re-match

I CAN'T BELIEVE I MISSED THIS THE TWO BEST DAYTIME GIRLS ON NIGHTS!!!!!!!!! can anyone please tell me when they are on next pleaseee