(18-04-2010 13:21 )admiral decker Wrote: [ -> ]I hear Babeworld have (allegedly) raised the white flag and surrendered the whole of their babe channel fleet.
You may well be correct Admiral, as a babe called Ani is mentioned in post No.1 on this thread (Pink Text). Unless there is another Ani that I am unaware of, it is most likely Babeworld's Ani that he is referring to.
Well Bluebird did say a few weeks ago that they'd bought 4 channels.
If Bluebird have bought up Babeworld and Live960, that leaves another 2 channels that we don't know.
Lets hope its not TVX who have 2 channels (913 and 956).
I woundn't miss channels 923 and 936 if they want to buy them.
(18-04-2010 14:54 )Charlemagne Wrote: [ -> ]If Bluebird have bought up Babeworld and Live960, that leaves another 2 channels that we don't know.
Lets hope its not TVX who have 2 channels (913 and 956).
I woundn't miss channels 923 and 936 if they want to buy them.
The other Two slots are props brand new slots an not a current babe channel slot.
100 BlueTV Babes
That's what we're aiming for across the Channels.
We've seen the concerns raised about not seeing your Fave Babes that often.
It means that
- most Babes will be on 3 Days or Nights a Week; and
- some babes will be on 2 Days or Nights a Week
So - whoever your Fave Babes are: you'll be getting your weekly fix !
Just to say about 'poaching'.
Every girl that has moved from Elite to us came to us and asked if we'd take her on.
We had no agreement with Elite not to use their former girls.
The Elite 4 who have joined us so far are just 4 out of our 100 Babes that we are looking to showcase over the coming year.
Out of that 100, we're looking to get a 50/50 split on existing Babechannel talent and previously unseen talent.
We do, by contrast, have an agreement with Cellcast/Babestation and we will not be taking on any of their girls even as/if any of their girls do contact us.
(20-04-2010 06:28 )BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL Wrote: [ -> ]...We do, by contrast, have an agreement with Cellcast/Babestation and we will not be taking on any of their girls even as/if any of their girls do contact us.
That's a shame as the girls from BS are the ones that need a "better" channel. Most are totally wasted, and even on the occasion they're allowed to do a decent show, they're hidden behind banners and graphics that take up a third of the screen.
(20-04-2010 06:28 )BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL Wrote: [ -> ]We do, by contrast, have an agreement with Cellcast/Babestation and we will not be taking on any of their girls even as/if any of their girls do contact us.
i seem to remember you guys putting up a picture/teaser of a shoot you had done with jessica/charlotte hurding who, correct me if i'm wrong, is employed by cellcast. how does that work then ?
(20-04-2010 11:11 )Freebird Wrote: [ -> ] (20-04-2010 06:28 )BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL Wrote: [ -> ]We do, by contrast, have an agreement with Cellcast/Babestation and we will not be taking on any of their girls even as/if any of their girls do contact us.
i seem to remember you guys putting up a picture/teaser of a shoot you had done with jessica/charlotte hurding who, correct me if i'm wrong, is employed by cellcast. how does that work then ?
An you have mentioned Linsey dawn mckenzie in another post of yours an she is currently on Babesation. So how does that work to ?