The UK Babe Channels Forum

Here you go...

Finally got to see the show last night after the technical problems the previous night.
Apparently my new TV is incompatible, it failed again last night, but my Sony PVR worked fine. I watched the first hour and recorded the next 2 hours ok.
It started with 15 minutes of the recent Lolly + Michelle video. This was pretty good and almost up to the best 2-4-1 standards of the sexstation webshow. Pussies were on view but no close ups like the webshow. Lots or rubbing and licking but obviously no penentration like the webshow. To compensate, there was full speech/sound from the 2 girls.
After that the show went a bit downhill. It seemed to be just a compilation of random short video clips lasting about 8 minutes each without any introductions at all. No idea who a lot of the girls were.
There was solo girl, girl-girl, boy-girl and threesomes, some with audio, some without.
A couple of the girl-girl ones were quite good, notably Danielle with Karina, Amber Leigh with Lolly Badcock and Amber Leigh with Antonia Stokes. Some of these seemed pretty old, Amber had fair hair in these.
The boy-girl vids were not very good, only tits and pubic hair on display. Very tame. This did not bother me anyway as I am not interested in seeing some blokes penis.

If I had actually paid a fiver to watch, I would not be demanding my money back, but I would probably not bother with it again either.

A good well written review by TheWatcher, thanks for your effort.

(16-04-2010 10:42 )TheWatcher Wrote: [ -> ]Finally got to see the show last night after the technical problems the previous night.
Apparently my new TV is incompatible, it failed again last night, but my Sony PVR worked fine. I watched the first hour and recorded the next 2 hours ok.
It started with 15 minutes of the recent Lolly + Michelle video. This was pretty good and almost up to the best 2-4-1 standards of the sexstation webshow. Pussies were on view but no close ups like the webshow. Lots or rubbing and licking but obviously no penentration like the webshow. To compensate, there was full speech/sound from the 2 girls.
After that the show went a bit downhill. It seemed to be just a compilation of random short video clips lasting about 8 minutes each without any introductions at all. No idea who a lot of the girls were.
There was solo girl, girl-girl, boy-girl and threesomes, some with audio, some without.
A couple of the girl-girl ones were quite good, notably Danielle with Karina, Amber Leigh with Lolly Badcock and Amber Leigh with Antonia Stokes. Some of these seemed pretty old, Amber had fair hair in these.
The boy-girl vids were not very good, only tits and pubic hair on display. Very tame. This did not bother me anyway as I am not interested in seeing some blokes penis.

If I had actually paid a fiver to watch, I would not be demanding my money back, but I would probably not bother with it again either.

thanks for the honest review, it definitely gives us something to work on. sorry again that you are having problems with the TV, we are still looking into fixes for that.

As our content of our own girls build up, there will be less and less archive footage, which means the channel can only get better and more relevant to the girls you want to see.

Thanks also for highlighting the problem with your TV, getting this information from viewers is vital for us to make the channel work on as many boxes as possible

(16-04-2010 10:42 )TheWatcher Wrote: [ -> ]If I had actually paid a fiver to watch, I would not be demanding my money back, but I would probably not bother with it again either.

m8 even when they offered free pins to any1 that pm'd em last night (the second night), i was so underwhelmed at the first night's show i didn't even bother asking... so there you go a honest reply. even when its free i dint think it was worth it...

maybe when they get some proper content that was hinted at in the threads that started the speculation that this channel would exist, ie, babestation babes exclusively, no filler. then yeah i would consider it worth it, but until then...

I didn't go back for 2nds last night, and like Watcher, probably won't unless I hear there's been significant improvement.
But what I don't understand is the show format... regardless of the whinges and moans, what BS do really well is give us Babeshows (ok we can argue about which girls, what they do, how much calls cost etc - just like we do) - but what they don't do well is pics & vids - as anyone who's seen the website knows.
So why have they launched as a vid channel?
What I want is a babeshow that goes further than the free to air channels, even if it can't be as hard as sexststation.
Live girls interacting with eachother and us, ok chuck in some vids, highlights etc, and let the girls have a laugh. There's room for all the girls, to go as far as they want, full nude or not.
Vids don't do it for me, esp like Watcher, when you get loads of the bloke doing the shagging and little of the girl you want to see - and better vids are so freely available why would I pay anyway? (Last night while Xtreme had Michelle & Lolly, I was watching recording of Michelle & Katie on SS - I don't need to see Xtreme to know which was best.)
Babeshows need live girl interaction - and thats all - its what BS do on all other channels and so simple that I just don't understand what they were thinking when they came up with this.
Its already been said that the girls are BS best asset - its them I want to see - Live. Thats what I was expecting, and thats why I was so disappointed with what they gave us.
Lots of platitudes and good talk coming from BS now, (shame they didn't talk about it before launch) but lets see what we have in a months time...

(16-04-2010 16:55 )misterG Wrote: [ -> ]I didn't go back for 2nds last night, and like Watcher, probably won't unless I hear there's been significant improvement.
But what I don't understand is the show format... regardless of the whinges and moans, what BS do really well is give us Babeshows (ok we can argue about which girls, what they do, how much calls cost etc - just like we do) - but what they don't do well is pics & vids - as anyone who's seen the website knows.
So why have they launched as a vid channel?
What I want is a babeshow that goes further than the free to air channels, even if it can't be as hard as sexststation.
Live girls interacting with eachother and us, ok chuck in some vids, highlights etc, and let the girls have a laugh. There's room for all the girls, to go as far as they want, full nude or not.
Vids don't do it for me, esp like Watcher, when you get loads of the bloke doing the shagging and little of the girl you want to see - and better vids are so freely available why would I pay anyway? (Last night while Xtreme had Michelle & Lolly, I was watching recording of Michelle & Katie on SS - I don't need to see Xtreme to know which was best.)
Babeshows need live girl interaction - and thats all - its what BS do on all other channels and so simple that I just don't understand what they were thinking when they came up with this.
Its already been said that the girls are BS best asset - its them I want to see - Live. Thats what I was expecting, and thats why I was so disappointed with what they gave us.
Lots of platitudes and good talk coming from BS now, (shame they didn't talk about it before launch) but lets see what we have in a months time...

thanks for giving us points we can actually forward onto the relevant people, whereas in the other threads its just been bashing where we can't answer other than laugh

we shall forward all points on and rely on the content team to deliver

(16-04-2010 16:37 )Hexit Wrote: [ -> ]

(16-04-2010 10:42 )TheWatcher Wrote: [ -> ]If I had actually paid a fiver to watch, I would not be demanding my money back, but I would probably not bother with it again either.

m8 even when they offered free pins to any1 that pm'd em last night (the second night), i was so underwhelmed at the first night's show i didn't even bother asking... so there you go a honest reply. even when its free i dint think it was worth it...

maybe when they get some proper content that was hinted at in the threads that started the speculation that this channel would exist, ie, babestation babes exclusively, no filler. then yeah i would consider it worth it, but until then...

we did indeed give free pins out to everyone who PMed us (apart from the accounts just setup to ask a pin to hide their real username)

that is all we have asked for, we're not asking you to pay for it each night.. we are asking for a chance, and your input, to make it right

Guys, I started this thread for people who did watch the show (or at least part of it), so that the rest of us can see how BSXtreme evolves, and whether it does become more like most people want it to be.

Bad reviews are OK (if that's what you thought), but people who just want to vocalise their reasons for not watching it should post their comments here:
Babestation XTREME.

(16-04-2010 17:25 )babestation Wrote: [ -> ]

(16-04-2010 16:37 )Hexit Wrote: [ -> ]

(16-04-2010 10:42 )TheWatcher Wrote: [ -> ]If I had actually paid a fiver to watch, I would not be demanding my money back, but I would probably not bother with it again either.

m8 even when they offered free pins to any1 that pm'd em last night (the second night), i was so underwhelmed at the first night's show i didn't even bother asking... so there you go a honest reply. even when its free i dint think it was worth it...

maybe when they get some proper content that was hinted at in the threads that started the speculation that this channel would exist, ie, babestation babes exclusively, no filler. then yeah i would consider it worth it, but until then...

we did indeed give free pins out to everyone who PMed us (apart from the accounts just setup to ask a pin to hide their real username)

that is all we have asked for, we're not asking you to pay for it each night.. we are asking for a chance, and your input, to make it right

my input to make it rite was there from the start, yes theres a shit load of fucking useless remarks 2 but in essance they all say the same thing.

BABESTATION GIRLS ONLY! NO FILLER! 40-50 mins of the hour of babstation girls interacting (phone chat/g/g/s) with some going further than others, with maybe 10-20 mins of babestation girls pre-recorded, that way you can get away with 3-4 girls per night. lower call costs if your pin encrypting... the biggest no no the forum is saying is the censored porn clips. we just want the babes doing a more explicit version of bs1-2-xtra and pl...