(28-01-2010 19:35 )schmoo Wrote: [ -> ]tsurugi.. it's Angels TV! Not sure if a punk looking girl could pass as a (traditional looking) angel..!?
Not heard of Burning Angel then i take it
Don't people want a channel which is different?
There's loads of babes who i would like to see on the channels but they only seem to be employing babes who have been on the channels a few years ago.
Satanic s.l.u.t.s has some great babes including voluptua. But as they only want the stereotypical glamour models we won't get any alternatives. Club paradiso has a blonde with lip piercings and tattoo's and she is one of my favourites.
www.glamourstarslive.com
Plus theres front magazine which is full of girls like vikki blows and alex sim wise.
(28-01-2010 19:42 )tsurugi Wrote: [ -> ]Not heard of Burning Angel then i take it
Err.. no. But i now know who you mean - not your traditional angels for sure!
Also not my cup of tea, obviously yours.. but is it Archangel's?
(28-01-2010 19:41 )skully Wrote: [ -> ]thestrange1,
The people in charge of channels appreciate constructive criticism, they want to give us the best quality show possible, so our feedback (good and bad) is helpful to them. But...you need to be more patient and stop being so negative, some of the established (big money) channels still have problems, the other newish channels are still finding their feet. I'm sure Archangel is taking note of things and will have everything running the way she wants soon enough.
But it takes time!
They don't seem to take any notice of feedback. Angels has been broadcasting for ages now and should be up and running.
I know the established channels e.g bangbabes have their problems because of theis awful current sets and the massive daytime graphics.
Why did franc get banned by the way?
sorry man....just remembered you saying the same thing this time last year.....sorry its taken us so long to respond!
thestrange1....as of this point - your comments have been noted, however, i am not responding to further comments.
(28-01-2010 20:48 )thestrange1 Wrote: [ -> ] (28-01-2010 19:41 )skully Wrote: [ -> ]thestrange1,
The people in charge of channels appreciate constructive criticism, they want to give us the best quality show possible, so our feedback (good and bad) is helpful to them. But...you need to be more patient and stop being so negative, some of the established (big money) channels still have problems, the other newish channels are still finding their feet. I'm sure Archangel is taking note of things and will have everything running the way she wants soon enough.
But it takes time!
They don't seem to take any notice of feedback. Angels has been broadcasting for ages now and should be up and running.
I know the established channels e.g bangbabes have their problems because of theis awful current sets and the massive daytime graphics.
Why did franc get banned by the way?
(28-01-2010 20:48 )thestrange1 Wrote: [ -> ]Why did franc get banned by the way?
He annoyed me, he was a prick with a personal agenda against the channel, remind you of anyone?
GOD DAM!!!! i just got off the phone to Sienna, Archangel give that girl a pay rise, and a cuddly toy (make it a walrus)
(03-02-2010 17:24 )little gimp Wrote: [ -> ]GOD DAM!!!! i just got off the phone to Sienna, Archangel give that girl a pay rise, and a cuddly toy (make it a walrus)
I concur. Incredibly sexy girl and fantastic conversation.
we are happy you guys like Sienna
(03-02-2010 21:08 )Rivers Wrote: [ -> ] (03-02-2010 17:24 )little gimp Wrote: [ -> ]GOD DAM!!!! i just got off the phone to Sienna, Archangel give that girl a pay rise, and a cuddly toy (make it a walrus)
I concur. Incredibly sexy girl and fantastic conversation.