(25-01-2013 02:38 )SteveHG Wrote: [ -> ]Don't know if anyone saw the pics being pushed tonight of Georgie with a "mystery porn star"? I'm guessing these might be of a session with Karina Currie she did which was pretty hot (bit of pussy licking I believe) but wondered if anyone had seen them or knew if there any more of these, and if so where?
Who knows, but according to Georgie, she doesn't eat vag
I found 2 pics of her with Ms Currie which featured some pussy licking elsewhere on another forum, but to be fair it was Karina doing the tongue work. On a side note, I joined Georgie's site recently and gotta IN MY OPINION ONLY say it's a real disappointment. Sure she is hotter than hell but I think it's a stretch to say she's Britain's Naughtiest Glamour model when she won't show any pussy.
Georgie a disappointment? Hmmm... I guess horny males are a demanding lot! There is plenty on the internet that is free and more explicit, but also it often seems crass and overtly explicit but wholly lacking in sensuality or eroticism. Her website certainly has moments where she is wonderfully, insanely sexy. Personally I have been completely besotted with Georgina Darby since she first appeared on Onlytease, so I am somewhat biased. For me, she is quite literally the sexiest woman I have ever seen... including my female friends, the entire world of models, Hollywood etc- womankind! Yes, I realize how crazy and bloody sad that sounds and probably is! But I find her eyes and THAT smile incredible and incomparable; she stirs my soul and other more primitive devices! Goddamn, she's hot to me. I exchanged some twitter pleasantries with Georgie a couple of years ago and that sealed the deal-she's funny, 'real' and normal. I haven't mentioned her body- awesome. And before Georgie I didn't like tatts or piercings on a lady- don't give a shit now- it's all beautiful! She's a lady (whoa-ohhh-ohhh!) she's a lady!
Easy now! I didn't say Georgie is a disappointment - far from it, her pics and vids show how insane that body of hers is - I just think that a model's subscription based, official website would be the place to have the hottest imagery, not loose around the internet as you mention, that's all. It's a bit difficult to buy into the whole 'fill my bucket' fun stuff if said bucket is carefully hidden for example. Just an observation.
Yeah, I know what you mean... but then it's all about the tease for some... for instance if Georgie started showing it all quite brazenly, there'd be nothing more to see and no mysteries. I'm not exactly saying I want to be teased endlessly but some modesty can go a long way- I think years of porn since my early teens finally bored me, so I much prefer an ickle bit of subtlety these days- never thought I'd tired of hardcore porn, but I did! Give me a sexy lady with a hot body, who knows how to shake it!
Don't pretend to be an expert on different girls' websites but I think it's probably fair to say that the girls who don't show anything on the various subscription video sites, webcams etc probably won't show any more on their own websites i.e. just because it's their own site doesn't seem to make it any more likely. An example of the opposite would be Sophia Knight who does full frontal on all these sites. I'm sure others could quote me examples where this is not the case.
I suspect Georgie's site is probably no tamer than many of the babeshow "models" i.e not pornstars. The simulated sex with the camera stuff is pretty good if a bit repetitive and she certainly does more than girls like Paige Tyler whose site seems to be mostly tasteful photos (speaking as a big PT fan before I get lynched!). But I haven't much experience of other sites so this may not be the general rule.
Of course if Georgie did start to flash occasionally on her site I would re-join in a heartbeat ...
Another fantastic night from Georgie, I just cant resist watching her oiled up. Absolute class.
Another quality night from Georgie, watching her spread that oil all over her body is something special
Nervous producer made her put her underwear back on
