The UK Babe Channels Forum

Free Adult Image Host - ImageChunk.com

She's AWESOME !!! Could you imagine a 2-4-1 with Caty & Amanda Rendall ?? This would be soooooooooo WILD !!!

(25-02-2010 20:40 )aubrey Wrote: [ -> ]She's AWESOME !!! Could you imagine a 2-4-1 with Caty & Amanda Rendall ?? This would be soooooooooo WILD !!!

It would also be incest, as there sisters. So I think you can forget that idea.

(25-02-2010 21:15 )aceman65 Wrote: [ -> ]

(25-02-2010 20:40 )aubrey Wrote: [ -> ]She's AWESOME !!! Could you imagine a 2-4-1 with Caty & Amanda Rendall ?? This would be soooooooooo WILD !!!

It would also be incest, as there sisters. So I think you can forget that idea.

I was about to say the same

Exactly. And I'm sure we'd all switch off in horror if it did happen.

Well...almost all of us would.
Well...
most of us would, well at least a few.

...okay none of us would switch off

I'm not sure that it is actually incest between sisters. Any legal experts out there?

(25-02-2010 23:05 )vila Wrote: [ -> ]I'm not sure that it is actually incest between sisters. Any legal experts out there?

This may cover your questions.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incest

(07-01-2010 14:21 )r0y7n Wrote: [ -> ]From Monday night

Caty Vid 1 (965)
Mon 04-01-10

This looks soo hot shame i cant download it can some one upload the video or put it on megaupload please thanks

(25-02-2010 23:05 )vila Wrote: [ -> ]I'm not sure that it is actually incest between sisters. Any legal experts out there?

It's not strictly (i.e. legally) incest because girls can't actually have sexual intercourse - i.e. penetration/insemination by penis. They can only mutually masturbate or perform cunnilingus which is foreplay not bonking.

The real issue with incest is in-bred offspring. I doubt same-sex/homosexual relations between close relatives would count as incest in a legal sense although it may in a moral/social sense depending on the culture.

There are in fact a few 'twincest' porno movies legally in circulation (at least in the US - don't know if the BBFC could ever bring themselves to pass such a thing (they even banned VT's 'Sisters' and that featured unrelated actors playing lezzie sisters)). One of the first and most famous real twin pornos is "Teenage Twins" (1976) starring Brooke and Taylor Young - this is a fairly normal porno but with one scene where the girls do each other. One of the most bizarre I know of (and not very erotic IMHO) is by a pair known as the "Urine Twins" - I'll say no more. There are several others but, to be frank, these twin flicks tend to get rather boring - even when the camera cuts from one view to the other you more or less get the same shot you had before. The novelty soon wears off. These films are perhaps curiosities and only for serious porn buffs and pervs.

As for Amanda and Caty together? I doubt they're up for it. It's a far better fantasy than reality -and best leave it there methinks (some things are simply better left undone). And what a pity the Government and all the censorial fuckwits can't make the same distinction between fantasy and reality or decide when some ideas are better left as mere ideas.