The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: S66 2-4-1 : Discussion & Chat
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41
To make sure that you get to see something worthwhile, the stream needs to be on the web for starters. With that in mind, next, we need to have the camera zoomed out, so we can at least see the babes and not mainly top half shots.Then as mention before on here, a pairing that are fresh to night shows. Not the likes of Preeti and Kandi, who know all the tricks and the faking. A pairing that is of course ok with forgetting social distancing. If they're up for it, the likes of Kimmy Worship and Jennifer Kelly would be ideal. Both have proved that by showing some free pussy on screen, doesn't stop the calls or perve cam customers coming in. In fact, it doubles it.
My concern was the tips they received last time the two were on that then just disappeared later in the show when they changed the tip goal. With no explanation etc or communication from the gallery. It was sadly on my mind that a repeat was on the cards, which I assume was also on other peoples too. Lack of confidence in the product is never good.
[Image: image-C6E1_5F1495B5.jpg]

I love Charmaine Sinclair Heart
Why bother doing a 2-4-1 in the studio if the quality is just as bad as a home show Huh

[Image: image-07E1_5F2F0575.jpg]
(08-08-2020 21:07 )Sm© Wrote: [ -> ]Why bother doing a 2-4-1 in the studio if the quality is just as bad as a home show Huh

[Image: image-07E1_5F2F0575.jpg]

The quality was fine, must be your connection
I have a super fast fibre connection and the stream was not very good quality. Even the lighting seemed too bright for the camera. I only watched for first hour, so may of improved later, but to begin with not good.

I thought the girls looked great though and from what I saw of them, performed well together.
(09-08-2020 02:13 )nick19888 Wrote: [ -> ]The quality was fine, must be your connection

No, it was as bad as it is baffling. They put out streams in 720p of their day girls laying down or sitting on a chair hardly moving all day long, yet when a show that is possibly worth bothering with happens they put it out on a low res, in this case 480p, with an awful framerate, then when these girls actually move (yeah, i know) it ends up like the screenshot above. Brooks' webshows are great but they get broadcast at 270p whilst her "tv shows" are in 720p bladewave

At risk of moaning on and on, they have been around long enough now to know what they should be doing, they just can't be bothered. Maybe the paying customers aren't complaining so they keep putting out low quality streams, i dunno, but either way, the sheer amount they charge for their services, they have to do better. It isn't an issue with anyone's internet connection.
Tori and Roxy did a really good GG show lastnight, they where having lots of fun together, both got naked and showed off Pussy on FTA, lots of boob play, the pussy play was on pervcam, it had some of the best FTA content i seen on 66 in ages,
In a few minutes S66 are going to let Jada and Preeti do a 2-4-1, prime time, Saturday night.
For weeks now other girls have tried but I couldn't tell you precisely why this type of show hasn't captured the viewer's imagination. Doing it whilst stars like tonight's pair were also on was surely not so hot an idea.

Surely two so experienced ought to be able to make it work to, more or less, universal acclaim.
Break a leg. Smile

[Image: image-680D_5F78E6D5.jpg]
[Image: image-18B4_5F94AC83.jpg]

Well now I haven't watched all of this but this looks like they're having fun. Surely it wasn't as easy as that...just do it from home
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41
Reference URL's