(13-05-2011 15:24 )alexxxi Wrote: [ -> ]If she turns up that is.... people moan about danica for a reason, and majority of the moaners have been fans of danica who obviously given up on her due to her poor, sluggish performances. Fair enuf that could be her style then so be it but its obvious when members post comment in here saying "fantastic show by danica" when its not exactly true people need to man up and post what they really think instead of having their "fanboy" goggles on. Wazo for instance defends dionne to a certain extent but still give criticism of dionne when shes poor.
As for danica showing her breasts.... how long did it take danica to get her tits out when she first did nightshows? so u cant use that against kelly. end of the day people moan for a reason and people do give constructive criticism in here... just in their own little weird way.
I still think her show the other night was DIRE. Thats my opinion of it as i mention in a different thread. I dont hate danica I just think shes taking the piss when shes on nights over the past few months whether its the producers fault or not.
So anybody that thinks different about a performance now has 'fanboy goggles' who the fuck decided what makes a decent performance? Is there a set or rules that defines said performances?
As it's been noted quite alot that Lori puts alot of energy into her performance which alot of people don't like, does anyone that like her performance have 'fanboy googles' on?
Everyone has a differrant idea of performance, what gives you the right to belittle & pretty much call them liars just cause your so narrow minded to understand that people have different tastes when it comes to performance?
Would it be fair for me to call you a sheep cause your following the majority?
What the hell has this thread turned into.
fi got brinsford calling me(not just me i know)- a moaner because i clearly saw a very boring danica show on wednesday the 2 4 1 was a disaster quite frankly.
That's a pretty sad assesment Brinsford, However you are within your right to stick up for danica without having to be subject to abuse for it (of course if you abuse others you deserve all you get)
And calling people moaners is abuse .
I think she should just leave tbh her heart aint in it really.
p.s alexxi is wrong for the following comment in my honest opinion.
Quote:Fair enuf that could be her style then so be it but its obvious when members post comment in here saying "fantastic show by danica" when its not exactly true people need to man up and post what they really think instead of having their "fanboy" goggles on
You cant subject people to being bias just because they dont agree with the consenus of a majority opinion, sure the opinion is wrong but its still just as valid as any other opinion and the person should not belittled for making it.
People can think what they want... I said people who say shes fantastic when obviously she was well below par need to get their facts straight... I dont watch lori so I cant exactly comment on her performance but I kno she always jumping around being exstatic when shes on. Its called figure of speech "fanboy goggles" - and who said I called them liars... I said for those to Man up who comments her being fantastic and praising her performance when it was obviously not .... as for the sheep comment... im from wales & theres plenty of sheep here but I'm not a follower unlike some members on the forum. I stand on my own ground and I like to keep it that way.
(13-05-2011 16:50 )gazfc Wrote: [ -> ]So anybody that thinks different about a performance now has 'fanboy goggles' who the fuck decided what makes a decent performance? Is there a set or rules that defines said performances?
As it's been noted quite alot that Lori puts alot of energy into her performance which alot of people don't like, does anyone that like her performance have 'fanboy googles' on?
Everyone has a differrant idea of performance, what gives you the right to belittle & pretty much call them liars just cause your so narrow minded to understand that people have different tastes when it comes to performance?
Would it be fair for me to call you a sheep cause your following the majority?
Quote:I said people who say shes fantastic when obviously she was well below par need to get their facts straight
But what if people did think she was fantastic sure there wrong in our eyes but its still a valid opinion so would they need to get their facts str8
well then those members can say what they like... im saying to those who say it for the sake of it. your more than happy to gang up on my posts
its not like im gonna go crying in the corner. ive said what i need to say so its end of story for me. If u feel offended by that little comment then u must have nothin else better to do
(13-05-2011 17:24 )alexxxi Wrote: [ -> ]People can think what they want... I said people who say shes fantastic when obviously she was well below par need to get their facts straight ... I dont watch lori so I cant exactly comment on her performance but I kno she always jumping around being exstatic when shes on. Its called figure of speech "fanboy goggles" - and who said I called them liars... I said for those to Man up who comments her being fantastic and praising her performance when it was obviously not .... as for the sheep comment... im from wales & theres plenty of sheep here but I'm not a follower unlike some members on the forum. I stand on my own ground and I like to keep it that way.
These comments suggest you're calling them liars
As for your 'gang up' comment, Aren't you doing the same to brinsfords post?
(13-05-2011 17:52 )alexxxi Wrote: [ -> ]I have nothing against brinsford, u can ask anyone on here gazfc ....its called "Replying" to a post made by him. it seems like you want to pick out a fight which isnt gonna happen
Are you for real?
Your replying, where ganging up on your post
Your replying, I'm picking a fight
*Shakes head in disbelief
I agree with Quiquems here. It's ridiculous that Danica is singled out for the shooting range every time she is on.
For a start, she pretty much always has a new or different look or style on a given night. Whether it is more subtle, edgy or sexy will be a matter of individual taste.
But in comparison there are certain girls turning up night after night doing exactly the same show in exactly the same outfit in exactly the same positions every time!...
but they seem to escape any kind of criticism on here. Bizarre really..
At least you never can be quite sure what you are going to get with Danica.
As for the 2-4-1 situation, it's always been very clear that she responds best when matched up with predatory bi girls like Caty or Sophia (where she enjoys being the centre of attention and gets into it) or failing that with a hardworking performer like Lori who can generate ideas and energy regardless.
Pairing her up with Dionne is always a damp squib, but that's neither the fault of Danica nor the extremely vanilla Dionne. It's an ongoing production faux-pas, that's all.
(13-05-2011 17:59 )chrislatimer Wrote: [ -> ]well chilly i aint seen no fanboy do that myself not even the uber fanboys like mr brinsford here.
Oh, he does. He'll happily tell you to give Danica a call if you want her to move about and do more, yet he'll then moan about how dull another
Elite TV gal is. Now, if he was to apply his own rules that he uses, then you'd think he'd call that so called dull gal in order to get her to do something he likes. Nope, because it's one rule for Danica and another for someone else. Remember the cheap shot he took at Delta? Take a cheap shot at Danica and he'll get all upset over it. Again, one rule for Danica it is.
Up until the recent absence, Danica's shows were fine. Not her best by any means, but fine with the pov stuff being the highlight and something a bit different for her.
Having been away for a while and her freeview debut in the offing you would have thought that on the back of her higher profile in the mags it would represent an ideal opportunity. A chance to let the freeview crowd see what all the fuss is about. Instead we get possibly her most lethargic and lacklustre show for many months.
Everybody on this forum knows that a 241 with Dionne or Danica only works with a 'proactive' partner........a Caty Cole/Lori for example. Both Danica and Dionne are stunning to look at and in the lads mags any of the almost static 241 poses would look great.
I am a huge fan of Danica as are a lot of the critics on here. I want to be praising her to the rafters because she has given me many months of pleasure. I haven't missed a nightshow as far as I can remember but the other night I started watching Adele and didn't feel compelled to switch back. I agree that Danica has on occasion attracted criticism when others seemed to get less flack for the same but that is because proportionately more people post about her such is her appeal. That appeal as far as these shows goes is waning I'm afraid and it is in direct proportion to her waning interest. Sorry Brinsford, that's how her appearance came over to me.