What happened to the good old days when full on pussy rubbing and girl girl action was allowed. After watching the sportxxx and chatback compilations, bluearmy posted, and comparing them to what they show now, it's nowhwere near as good.
Now the the only thing to get excited about is the rare occasion there is a bit of pussy flashing and see through panties.
They must have been making shitloads of dosh, before it turned soft.
The unencrypted show leading up to the encrypted show must have been a HUGE moneyspinner. I would have paid for the encrypted show every night if i had the money. All the money and power to the channels that bring back the good stuff.
Oh god, i do hope this happens, it's sooooooooooooooo frustrating not being able to do much. I just want to get stuck right in lol.
xxxxxxxxxx
im very bored of these channels now,i hardly watch and if i do it,ll be only cuz abbis on
OBVIOUSLY IT WAS BETTER BACK IN THE DAY BUT I SOMETIMES LIKE TO KEEP SOMETHINGS TO THE IMAGINATION. and if u want 2 c more the babes usually have a website, or there r more explicit pics somewhere. i doubt no one subscribed to their websites back then as they could see everything on the channels. mind u i always say fuck ofcom
Hi everyone,
Personally I would be up for a far naughtier show any day of the week but like SOCATOA said us girls would risk losing our job and end up costing the boss thousands and thousands of pounds in fines.
One good thing about being softer is that it is less intimidating for a guy who is perhaps a bit shy to call in and new to interactive television. I think being more subtle can make the girls more approachable in some ways. Also leaving more to the imagination can be exciting and provocative but I just can't resist wearing those skimpy thongs boys!
Bailey x x
Yes i agree with you Dragonking. It would become boring if it was hard stuff all the time. I'd obviously like to see more but the element of surprise is much more exciting as in last night on Channel 960
If ofcom came to their senses, they would realise that back in the day when the channels showed much better content, the tax coffers would have been full to the brim, the countrys foreign debt would be paid of, interest rates would be down, we get our porn, and everybody's happy.
I must admit i don't watch the channels as much as i used to. I like many others miss the days when it much more hardcore till ofcom clamped down on the content, but at the same time i do agree with a bit of tease so it mix's things up a bit and keep things fresh. i know that its not the channels or the girls to blame for whats happened its ofcom have stepped once more spoiled everyone's fun. I think what would be better and its been said loads of times before on the forum is to pin protect the channels, they do it with sky movie channels now allowing 15 and 18 rated films to be shown during the daytime. by doing this we get to see what we want and parent not wanting there children to see such images can just simply pin protect or block the channels.
Well, right now Ofcom's Code isn't worth the paper its written on. Since the VRA 1984 was declared unenforceable a few weeks ago due to legal cock up by the Tories back in 1984, there isn't (and never has been) a legal definition of R18 material. So, as Ofcom decided to refer to 'R18-type' material in their Code and ban it from air, they've actually banned something that doesn't legally exist and thus cannot be enforced by law.
Apart from this shambles, Ofcom are NOT legally entitled to "use a broadcast licensing system to suppress any legally available material" according to the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights and the interpretation of Article 10 of the Human Rights Act 1998. Ofcom never had the power or authority to declare an outright ban on R18-type material even when we all thought it did exist. All they're entitled to do is restrict the tranmission of such material to a time when it is unlikely any children that might be harmed would be watching. And contrary to popular belief, whether a child knows the $ky PIN or not, pulling the viewing card out of the receiver card slot is a 100% reliable 'technological means' of securing any unauthorised access to all satellite channels.
The real issue however is this. In the year 2000 the BBFC failed to convince the High Court that children COULD be harmed by seeing hardcore porn. This is WHY we're allowed to by hardcore R18 from sex shops and by mail order from foreign websites to watch at home on our own TVs. If the High Court had seen any evidence that hardcore porn was at all a danger to the "moral or psychological development of children" then they would not have ORDERED the BBFC to include explicit sex at R18.
However, for some utterly unexplained reason, Ofcom have decided that this High Court ruling doesn't apply to them (even though by naming the BBFC R18 rating they are assuming all legal precedents associated with it and the BBFC). Ofcom seem to believe they can pretend R18 and explicit sex is somehow a danger to the "moral and psychological devlopment of children" despite there being no evidence to support this belief. Without such evidence to prove this "moral and psychological" harm to children, Ofcom are acting in breach of Article 10 (Freedom of Expression), they are also defying the High Court ruling that says R18-type material IS safe and suitable for viewing in the home.
Ofcom don't have a legal leg to stand on.
I suppose the real question is why perhaps you good people haven't written to your MPs and complained at the way Ofcom have denied you your right to watch perfectly legal material on adult TV services as if parents are incapable of looking after their own children's wellfare - because that's the ONLY conclusion one can reach as to why Ofcom have denied ADULTS their Fundamental Right to view ADULT material...! The High Court didn't let the BBFC do this so why the hell do Ofcom believe they can?
